Volume 18 Supplement 1

34th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine

Open Access

ICU nursing connectivity and the quality of care in an academic medical center: a network analysis

  • DM Kelly1,
  • DC Angus1,
  • D Krackhardt2 and
  • JM Kahn1
Critical Care201418(Suppl 1):P18

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13208

Published: 17 March 2014

Introduction

A collaborative nurse work environment is associated with ICU quality, yet collaborative interaction is difficult to measure. Network analysis may be an innovative tool to measure interactions. We sought to determine the feasibility of network analysis to measure ICU nurse connectivity and test whether key network measures were associated with the ICU quality of care.

Methods

We performed a network analysis in eight ICUs within an urban academic medical center in the United States during 2011. Using scheduling data, we defined network ties as instances when two ICU nurses worked together in the same ICU for 4 hours or more. We examined each ICUU+2019s network by visualizing sociograms and by measuring two network properties: density and clustering. Density measures the cohesion within a network on a scale from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating more cohesion. Clustering assesses the local neighborhoods on a scale from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a more decentralized network. We examined variation in network measures across ICUs and tested the correlation between network measures and the proportion of patients receiving daily interruption of sedation (DIS).

Results

There was wide variation in the networks, with density ranging from 79 to 96 and clustering ranging from 88 to 97. Two sample sociograms are shown in Figure 1: ICU A had a very high density (96) and clustering coefficient (97) suggesting a cohesive and decentralized network, contrasting with ICU H that had the lowest density (79) and clustering coefficient (88). Greater density and clustering was positively associated with DIS (B = 0.02 (-0.10, 0.14); B = 0.003 (-0.07, 0.07)) but did not achieve statistical significance in our small sample.
Figure 1

Sociograms of ICU A and ICU H.

Conclusion

We found substantial variation in ICU nursing networks across eight ICUs in one academic medical center. These patterns may have implications for evidence-based practice implementation. More work is needed to understand the role of network analysis as a reliable tool for improving and understanding ICU organization.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Pittsburgh
(2)
Carnegie Mellon University

Copyright

© Kelly et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement