- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Stratifying septic patients using lactate: severe sepsis and cryptic, vasoplegic and dysoxic shock profile
© Ranzani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
- Published: 5 November 2013
- Septic Shock
- Severe Sepsis
- Septic Patient
- Septic Shock Patient
- Survive Sepsis Campaign
The current consensus definition of severe sepsis and septic shock includes a heterogeneous profile of patients under the same definition. Although the prognostic value of hyperlactatemia in sepsis is well established, hyperlactatemia can be found both in severe sepsis and septic shock patients. We sought to compare features and outcomes of septic patients stratified by two factors: the presence of hyperlactemia and persistent hypotension.
This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter observational study from 10 private hospitals in Brazil (Rede Amil-SP) aiming to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted program to implement the Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles. We retrieved 1,948 septic patients with an initial lactate level collected within the first 6 hours of diagnosis. Based on previous literature, we stratified them into four groups according to the presence of hypoperfusion (lactate >4 mmol/l) and/or persistent hypotension despite adequate fluids: 1, severe sepsis (without both criteria); 2, cryptic shock (hypoperfusion without persistent hypotension) ; 3, vasoplegic shock (persistent hypotension without hypoperfusion); and 4, dysoxic shock (with both criteria) .
Severe sepsis was found in 1,018 (52%), cryptic shock in 162 (8%), vasoplegic shock in 549 (28%) and dysoxic shock in 219 (12%) patients. Mean age was 60 years, 47% were male and the majority was admitted form the emergency department (47%). The lung was the principal source of infection, followed by the urinary tract and abdominal. Overall, the four groups presented significant differences in APACHE II and SOFA scores (P < 0.001 for both), dysoxic shock being the most severe group. In post-hoc analysis, patients in the severe sepsis group presented similar SOFA score to patients in the cryptic shock group (P = 0.20). Overall, 28-day crude survival was different between groups (P < 0.001), being higher for the severe sepsis group (69%, P < 0.001 vs. other), similar between cryptic and vasoplegic shock (53%, P = 0.39) and lower for dysoxic shock (38%, P < 0.001 vs. other). In an adjusted analysis considering age, APACHE II and SOFA, the 28-day survival remained different between groups (P < 0.001) and the hazard ratio for the dysoxic shock group was the highest: HR 2.99 (95% CI 2.21 to 4.05).
Current definitions for severe sepsis and septic shock include four different phenotypes, which should be considered for epidemiology purposes, customizing treatment goals and inclusion criteria for future studies. Although previous studies showed similar outcomes between cryptic shock and overt septic shock (vasoplegic and dysoxic profile), we demonstrated that cryptic shock is similar only to vasoplegic shock.
On behalf of the Amil Critical Care Group.
- Hernandez G, Bruhn A, Castro R, Pedreros C, Rovegno M, Kattan E, Veas E, Fuentealba A, Regueira T, Ruiz C, et al: Persistent sepsis-induced hypotension without hyperlactatemia: a distinct clinical and physiological profile within the spectrum of septic shock. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012, 2012: 536852-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sterling SA, Puskarich MA, Shapiro NI, Trzeciak S, Kline JA, Summers RL, Jones AE, (EMSHOCKNET) EMSRN: Characteristics and outcomes of patients with vasoplegic versus tissue dysoxic septic shock. Shock. 2013, 40: 11-14. 10.1097/SHK.0b013e318298836d.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.