Skip to content

Advertisement

Volume 17 Supplement 4

Sepsis 2013

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Early prediction of SIRS and sepsis development via chemiluminescent analysis

  • 1
Critical Care201317 (Suppl 4) :P20

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12920

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Luminol
  • Septic Complication
  • Neutrophil Function
  • Microbicidal Action
  • Optimal Experiment Design

Background

Neutrophils as a part of nonspecific immunity factors play a crucial role in antimicrobial resistance. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are an important compound of the neutrophils' microbicidal action. Analysis of neutrophils' ROS production could provide valuable data on a phagocyte link of immunity [1]. A chemiluminescent (CL) assay being highly sensitive allows evaluating oxidative output of the cells in dynamics. Many studies on neutrophil CL in humans with different diseases have been published [2, 3]. However, the results often vary between authors because of the lack of standardized method of CL analysis. So we have developed a methodology of neutrophils' CL analysis according to the principles of evidence-based medicine.

Materials and methods

One hundred and twenty healthy donors and 17 ICU patients with second-third-degree burns participated in this study. We held an assay on the 1st, 8th and 15th day after injury and later; 37 observations in total. To dilute blood samples we used Hank's balanced salt saline (HBSS) with glucose, pH 7.4. Luminol (Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in double-distilled water at 1 mM. N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (FMLP; Sigma-Aldrich) and 4-phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA; Sigma-Aldrich) were diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (MP Biomedicals, LLC) to make stock solutions that were dissolved in HBSS on the day of experiment. CL was evaluated by means of a chemiluminometer Lum-12 (Department of Biophysics, Moscow State University) [4].

Results

We substantiate an optimal experiment design in the context of obtaining the highest intensity of analytic signal and reproducible findings. Thus we have developed a method for evaluation of a neutrophil function, based on a step-by-step stimulation of the cells by PMA and FMLP. Using our approach, we investigated the distributions of CL characteristics for the population of 80 healthy donors. We obtained reproducible kinetic profiles with intensive flash and absent glow phase of emission in all of the samples. Profiles of ICU patients' samples showed high intensity of both flash and glow phase of emission (Figure 1). Insufficient glow phase indicated subsequent development of severe septic complications.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Kinetics of CL response in ICU patient and donor.

Conclusions

As a result we suggest a reliable and replicable method for the evaluation of a neutrophil function. Investigation of the glow phase of the emission is promising to forecast risks of septic complications; we constructed a range of values of adjusted CL glow amplitude at different neutrophil counts that indicates a low probability of SIRS and septic complications that could be useful for correction of intensive treatment tactics.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The author would like to express deepest appreciation to all those who provided the possibility to perform this research. The author wishes to thank Prof. YA Vladimirov and the team of Department of Biophysics at Moscow State University (Russia) and Dr MA Godkov for assistance and guidance with this study and for submitting of equipment and reagents. Also the author would like to thank Dr EN Kobzeva and Prof. Dr SV Smirnov for the opportunity to work with blood donors and ICU patients. Furthermore, the author would also like to acknowledge with much appreciation Dr VV Kulabukhov and the staff of the Department of Burn Resuscitation at Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery (Moscow, Russia) for their suggestions and encouragement.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Immunology, Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Pediatric Haematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Edwards SW: Biochemistry and Physiology of the Neutrophil. 1994, Cambridge University PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Vladimirov YA, Proscurnina EV: Free radicals and cell chemiluminescence. Biochemistry. 2009, 74: 1545-1566.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dahlgren C, Karlsson A, Bylund J: Measurement of respiratory burst products generated by professional phagocytes. Methods Mol Biol. 2007, 412: 349-363. 10.1007/978-1-59745-467-4_23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Obraztsov IV: An evaluation of neutrophil function: a new approach to the chemiluminescent analysis [abstract]. Immunology. 2012, 137 (s1): 199-Google Scholar

Copyright

© Obraztsov et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement