Preliminary study of ventilation with 4 ml/kg tidal volume in acute respiratory distress syndrome: feasibility and effects on cyclic recruitment - derecruitment and hyperinflation
Cyclic recruitment-derecruitment and overdistension contribute to ventilator-induced lung injury. Tidal volume (Vt) may influence both, cyclic recruitment-derecruitment and overdistension. The goal of this study was to determine if decreasing Vt from 6 to 4 ml/kg reduces cyclic recruitment-derecruitment and hyperinflation, and if it is possible to avoid severe hypercapnia.
Methods
Patients with pulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were included in a crossover study with two Vt levels: 6 and 4 ml/kg. The protocol had two parts: one bedside and other at the CT room. To avoid severe hypercapnia in the 4 ml/kg arm, we replaced the heat and moisture exchange filter by a heated humidifier, and respiratory rate was increased to keep minute ventilation constant. Data on lung mechanics and gas exchange were taken at baseline and after 30 minutes at each Vt (bedside). Thereafter, a dynamic CT (4 images/sec for 8 sec) was taken at each Vt at a fixed transverse region between the middle and lower third of the lungs. Afterward, CT images were analyzed and cyclic recruitment-derecruitment was determined as non-aerated tissue variation between inspiration and expiration, and hyperinflation as maximal hyperinflated tissue at end-inspiration, expressed as % of lung tissue weight.
Results
We analyzed 10 patients. Decreasing Vt from 6 to 4 ml/kg consistently decreased cyclic recruitment-derecruitment from 3.6 (2.5 to 5.7) % to 2.9 (0.9 to 4.7) % (P <0.01) and end-inspiratory hyperinflation from 0.7 (0.3 to 2.2) to 0.6 (0.2 to 1.7) % (P = 0.01). No patient developed severe respiratory acidosis or severe hypercapnia when decreasing Vt to 4 ml/kg (pH 7.29 (7.21 to 7.46); PaCO2 48 (26 to 51) mmHg).
Conclusions
Decreasing Vt from 6 to 4 ml/kg reduces cyclic recruitment-derecruitment and hyperinflation. Severe respiratory acidosis may be effectively prevented by decreasing instrumental dead space and by increasing respiratory rate.
Introduction
The main mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) are overdistension and cyclic recruitment-derecruitment (R/D). While low tidal volume (Vt) has been applied successfully with the rationale of preventing overdistension [1], high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) strategies, which should theoretically help to prevent cyclic R/D, have not been able to show a clear benefit on survival in acute respiratory distress (ARDS) patients [2–4]. One of the main drawbacks of increasing PEEP to prevent cyclic R/D is that a parallel increase in stress and strain occurs at end-inspiration.
We recently showed that Vt is also an important determinant of cyclic R/D, and that high Vt may induce injury not only by inducing overdistension, but also cyclic R/D. However, we observed that at a Vt of 6 ml/kg there was still evidence of cyclic R/D [5]. Other studies have also shown that a Vt of 6 ml/kg may still be associated to hyperinflation, which has been shown to be a relevant marker of VILI [6, 7]. Therefore, it has been proposed that in order to achieve higher levels of protection, it may be necessary to move toward ultra-protective strategies [6, 8, 9]. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation or extracorporeal lung support techniques have been suggested as potential alternatives in this direction. However, these interventions require rather complex technologies, not widely available, and which have still not proven to be superior to conventional protective mechanical ventilation.
An alternative strategy may be to optimize conventional protective mechanical ventilation by further decreasing Vt below 6 ml/kg. Based on our previous findings, we hypothesize that this intervention may further decrease cyclic R/D, but in contrast to increasing PEEP, a lower Vt may also decrease the risk of overdistension. However, an important concern with using very low Vt is the risk of severe hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis.
The goal of this preliminary physiologic study was to determine if decreasing Vt from 6 to 4 ml/kg, with conventional mechanical ventilation, is effective to reduce cyclic R/D and hyperinflation, and if it is possible to prevent severe hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis at such very low Vt, without using extracorporeal lung support techniques.
Materials and methods
We designed a crossover study at two Vt levels: 6 and 4 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW). The protocol had two parts: one at the bedside and other at the computed tomography (CT) room. The Research Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine of the Universidad Católica de Chile granted approval for this study, and informed consent was obtained from the patients' next of kin. We included patients with acute onset of hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 <300), bilateral opacities in chest X-ray, without evidence of left ventricle overload, connected to mechanical ventilation for less than 48 hours, and who required a lung CT scan according to the treating physician.
Ventilatory protocol
At baseline all patients were ventilated in assist - control mode, with a heat and moisture exchanging filter (HMEF, compressible volume = 57 ml), under deep sedation and neuromuscular paralysis. The first part of the protocol took part at the ICU (ICU protocol). Starting from usual ventilatory care, patients were ventilated in a random order with two different settings for 30 minutes each: (a) Vt 6 with Vt 6 ml/kg PBW, and (b) Vt 4 with Vt 4 ml/kg PBW. Respiratory rates at each setting were calculated to keep minute ventilation constant and identical to baseline, despite the change in Vt values. Total PEEP was measured in all patients at 4 and 6 ml/kg after a 2-second end-expiratory pause. For both settings I:E time ratio was kept at 1:2, inspiratory pause at 10%. PEEP and FiO2 were kept at baseline levels and were not modified during the protocol. Following the general protocol of the ICU, PEEP was set according to best compliance after an initial recruitment maneuver of 40 cmH20 for 40 seconds, followed by a decremental PEEP trial [10]. Although an HMEF was used routinely in our ICU unless severe hypercapnia was present, for the 4 ml/kg arm (but not for the 6ml/kg arm) HMEF was replaced by a heated humidifier to compensate for the increase in dead space [11]. Based on previous trials, which applied permissive hypercapnia, severe respiratory acidosis was defined as pH <7.2 and severe hypercapnia as PaCO2 >80 mmHg [12, 13]. For safety reasons we predefined that the protocol could be stopped at any moment if marked alterations in systemic hemodynamics were observed.
Thereafter, patients were transferred to the CT room. After performing a conventional whole lung CT scan (LightSpeed VCT, GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK), a 1.25 mm-thick CT slice, between the middle and lower third of the thorax, was selected for the dynamic protocol (CT protocol).
Dynamic CT protocol
As described elsewhere [5], CT was set in cine mode at fixed position with a matrix of 512 × 512, at a velocity of 0.4 sec/rotation, for 8 seconds, with image reconstruction every 250 msec, which resulted in 32 consecutive images. A cine-CT was performed at each ventilatory setting, without interrupting ventilation, following the same crossover sequence as the ICU protocol, and after a short period of stabilization of 5 to 10 minutes at each of the two settings.
Image analysis
Each still scan image was quantitatively analyzed with the aid of a custom-designed software package (MALUNA™, University of Gottingen, Germany). Distribution of densities within the region of interest was determined according to predefined limits: hyperinflated (HIT) (-900 to -1000 HU), normally aerated (AT) (-500 to -900 HU), poorly aerated (PAT) (-100 to -500 HU) and non-aerated tissue compartments (NAT) (-100 to +100 HU) [14]. The four compartments were expressed as a percentage of the total lung slice weight. The maximal (max), minimal (min), and cyclic variation (Δ, with Δ = max-min) of the four compartments, in each respiratory cycle included within the 8 sec-dCT, were registered and averaged to obtain the corresponding values for the ventilatory setting. R/D was defined as ΔNAT. Based on the appearance of lung morphology on CT, each patient was classified as having focal or non-focal distribution of attenuations [15].
Statistical analysis
Data were compared by Wilcoxon signed rank test. Analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism version 5.00 for Windows, (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Data are expressed as median (range) and a P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
We analyzed ten patients (six male), who had a median age of 45 (17 to 87) years old, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score of 20 (4 to 29) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score of 10 (3 to 17) (Table 1). Although all patients had a pulmonary origin of their ARDS, their CT scan showed a bilateral involvement and a non-focal distribution of attenuations. They were on their first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation. At the moment of the study three patients had mild, six had moderate and one had severe ARDS, according to the grading criteria proposed by the recent ARDS consensus in Berlin [16].
Table 1
Patient characteristics at baseline.
Patient number
APACHE II
SOFA
PEEP (cmH2O)
Vt
(ml/kg)
PaO2/FiO2
ARDS onset (days)
Minute ventilation (L/min)
Etiology
1
17
6
16
3.9
148
0
11.1
H1N1
2
5
15
16
6.0
71
0
10.6
Sev Pn
3
23
9
12
9.6
197
0
7.3
Asp
4
23
11
10
6.0
254
0
7.0
H1N1
5
14
9
10
6.1
280
0
9.3
Sev Pn
6
22
17
12
5.6
148
0
8.6
AH
7
29
12
14
7.0
123
0
7.9
Asp
8
15
3
10
6.5
142
0
7.9
H1N1
9
4
3
14
6.0
148
0
7.4
Asp
10
24
15
12
7.6
265
1
8.6
Sev Pn
min
4
3
10
3.9
71
0
7.3
max
29
17
16
9.6
280
1
11.1
median
20
10
12
6.0
148
0
8.2
AH, alveolar hemorrhage; APACHE II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; Asp, aspiration; H1N1, influenza A H1N1; max, maximal value; min, minimal value; PaO2/FiO2, the ratio of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood and fraction of inspired oxygen; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; Sev Pn, severe pneumonia; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; Vt, tidal volume.
When decreasing Vt to 4 ml/kg there was a significant decrease in plateau pressure, mean airway pressure and driving pressure, but no change in respiratory system compliance (Table 2 Figure 1). No patient developed auto-PEEP at any moment of the protocol. There was no change in PaO2, or in PaO2/FiO2. PaCO2 and pH increased marginally, but not significantly, when applying the Vt 4 strategy (Table 3, Figure 2). However, no patient developed severe respiratory acidosis or severe hypercapnia during ventilation with Vt 4 ml/kg. The lowest pH observed with Vt 4 ml/kg was 7.22 and the highest PaCO2 was 51 mmHg. In addition, there was no significant change in systemic hemodynamics during the study period and all patients completed the whole protocol.
Table 2
Respiratory variables.
Tidal volume
Vt 4
Vt 6
P
Tidal volume (ml)
248 (210-300)
373 (310-450)
0.005
Respiratory rate (breaths/min)
37 (28-39)
25 (19-26)
0.005
Plateau pressure (cmH2O)
21 (16-23)
24 (18-28)
0.008
Mean airway pressure (cmH2O)
15 (13-20)
16 (14-21)
0.010
Driving airway pressure (cmH2O)
7 (4-12)
11 (6-18)
0.009
ComplianceRS(ml/cmH2O)
39 (18-53)
40 (17-53)
0.234
Values in the table are expressed as median (minimal - maximal). All variables were compared by Wilcoxon signed rank test. Driving airway pressure was calculated as plateau pressure - total positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). RS, respiratory system; Vt 4, tidal volume 4 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW); Vt 6, tidal volume 6 ml/kg PBW.
Figure 1
Individual changes in plateau pressure. The graphs present individual data of plateau pressure during the protocol, with the five patients randomized to the sequence Vt 4 to Vt 6 (ml/kg) (A) and the five patients randomized to the sequence Vt 6 to Vt 4 (ml/kg) (B). Vt, tidal volume.
Table 3
Systemic hemodynamics and gas exchange.
Tidal volume
Vt 4
Vt 6
P
Mean arterial pressure (mmHg)
79 (65-99)
76 (65-92)
0.725
Heart rate (beats/min)
110 (70-135)
106 (68-126)
0.513
pCO2 (mmHg)
48 (26-51)
45 (27-51)
0.148
pH
7.29 (7.21-7.46)
7.31 (7.20-7.47)
0.105
pO2 (mmHg)
86 (54-168)
93 (61-162)
0.358
EtCO2 (mmHg)
38 (24-50)
37 (26-45)
0.359
Alveolar dead space fraction (% Vt)
13 (2-36)
12 (3-33)
0.820
Values in the table are expressed as median (minimal - maximal). All variables were compared by Wilcoxon signed rank test. EtCO2, end tidal CO2; pCO2, partial pressure of CO2; pO2, partial pressure of O2; Vt 4, tidal volume 4 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW); Vt 6, tidal volume 6 ml/kg PBW.
Figure 2
Individual changes in pH. The graphs present individual data of pH during the protocol, with the five patients randomized to the sequence Vt 4 to Vt 6 (ml/kg) (A) and the five patients randomized to the sequence Vt 6 to Vt 4 (ml/kg) (B). Vt, tidal volume.
When compared with Vt of 6 ml/kg, Vt 4 significantly decreased ΔNAT and this effect was consistent in all patients (Table 4, Figure 3A). Delta HIT and HITmax also decreased significantly with Vt 4 ml/kg (Table 4 Figure 3B). There was no change in NATmax between both Vts (Figure 3C). We found no relation between ARDS severity and ΔNAT or HIT max.
Table 4
Analysis of density fractions of the lungs.
Tidal volume
Vt 4
Vt 6
P
Maximal non-aereated tissue
49 (27-76)
50 (26-76)
0.845
Maximal poorly aerated tissue
28 (15-44)
28 (15-45)
0.695
Maximal normally aerated tissue
24 (10-46)
25 (10-45)
0.275
Maximal hyperinflated tissue
0.6 (0.2-1.7)
0.7 (0.3-2.2)
0.013
Minimal non-aerated tissue
46 (24-73)
46 (21-73)
0.232
Minimal poorly aerated tissue
26 (14-42)
26 (14-39)
0.431
Minimal normally aerated tissue
22 (9-45)
22 (9-42)
0.431
Minimal hyperinflated tissue
0.2 (0.1-1.1)
0.2 (0.1-1.0)
0.128
Δ Non-aerated tissue
2.9 (0.9-4.7)
3.6 (2.5-5.7)
0.006
Δ Poorly aerated tissue
2.9 (1.0-4.4)
3.2 (0.4-6.1)
0.322
Δ Normally aerated tissue
1.6 (0.0-4.15)
2.1 (0.7-6.7)
0.131
Δ Hyperinflated tissue
0.3 (0.1-0.6)
0.5 (0.2-1.2)
0.002
Values in the table correspond to percentage of total lung slice weight and are expressed as median (minimal - maximal). All variables were compared by Wilcoxon signed rank test. Δ, difference between maximal and minimal values. Vt 4, tidal volume 4 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW); Vt 6, tidal volume 6 ml/kg PBW.
Figure 3
Individual changes in Δ non-aerated, maximal hyperinflated and maximal non-aerated tissue. The graphs present Δ non-aerated (A), maximal hyperinflated (B) and maximal non-aerated tissue (C) (expressed as % of lung tissue weight) for each of the 10 patients with Vt 4 and Vt 6 ml/kg. Vt, tidal volume.
Discussion
In this preliminary physiologic study we showed in 10 ARDS patients that by decreasing Vt from 6 to 4 ml/kg we were able to reduce cyclic R/D, as well as hyperinflated tissue, plateau pressures and driving pressures. Severe respiratory acidosis and severe hypercapnia could be effectively prevented at Vt 4 ml/kg by increasing respiratory rate and reducing instrumental dead space.
Experimental studies using dynamic CT, subpleural videomicroscopy and PaO2 oscillations, have shown evidence that cyclic R/D may occur in ARDS [17–19]. Recently, by applying dynamic CT during mechanical ventilation we provided evidence that cyclic R/D also occurs in ARDS patients [5]. In that study, we demonstrated that decreasing Vt from a high to a low Vt (12 to 6 ml/kg) markedly decreased cyclic R/D. Now, we showed that cyclic R/D may be further decreased by applying a very low Vt, such as 4 ml/kg. Although a 0.7% absolute reduction in R/D may appear as modest, CT scan may systematically underestimate R/D because of the limited resolution of CT images, which defines that the mean CT attenuation measured on each voxel is an average of different alveolar densities. Therefore, voxels showing apparently aerated units at end expiration may contain several collapsed and unstable alveoli mixed with aerated units. In fact, videomicroscopic images obtained in experimental models confirm that unstable alveoli can be adjacent to stable alveoli.
Besides the potential benefit of reducing cyclic R/D, reduction in Vt decreased airway pressures, specifically plateau pressure. Hyperinflated tissue decreased in parallel to plateau pressure. Therefore, these data suggest that a very low Vt may prevent both, overdistension and cyclic R/D. Recently, Terragni et al. showed in ARDS patients that decreasing Vt from 6.3 ± 0.2 to 4.2 ± 0.3 ml/kg, was associated to a decrease in tidal hyperinflation, which was paralleled by a decrease in pulmonary inflammation, as assessed by cytokines in bronchoalveolar lavage [6]. However, in their study, Vt reduction was associated to an increase in PEEP levels, and hypercapnia was avoided by the use of extracorporeal CO2 removal.
One of the major concerns of using a very low Vt is the risk of hypercapnia. Richecoeur et al. showed several years ago that rather simple interventions such as increasing respiratory rate and decreasing instrumental dead space could be effective to control hypercapnia in ARDS patients [20]. Therefore, during ventilation with 4 ml/kg we increased respiratory rate to keep constant minute ventilation. In addition, we reduced instrumental dead space by replacing the HMEF by a heated humidifier. This intervention has been shown to be effective to reduce PaCO2 while ventilating ARDS patients with a low Vt strategy [11, 21]. Although some authors have suggested that HMEFs should be avoided during ventilation with a Vt of 6 ml/kg [22], this is not a standard practice, and furthermore, several ICUs keep using HMEFs in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients [23, 24]. In the present study we kept the HMEF during ventilation with Vt 6, as was the usual practice in our ICU, but we removed it during ventilation with Vt 4. Although this variation in dead space between Vt 6 and Vt 4 limits the possibility of comparing PaCO2 and pH with both Vts, the purpose of this part of the study was just to determine if severe hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis could be avoided during ventilation with Vt 4. Although 30 minutes may seem a short period, it has been shown that it is enough to reach a new equilibrium in PaCO2 after changes in ventilation [25, 26]. Our data suggest that a ventilatory strategy based on a Vt of 4 ml/kg would be feasible in several ARDS patients. However, we acknowledge that only one patient had a severe ARDS, and therefore, future studies should determine whether this intervention can be applied in severe ARDS patients without inducing severe respiratory acidosis or requiring CO2 extracorporeal removal.
In the present study we used respiratory rates as high as 39/minute during ventilation with Vt 4. Interestingly, we did not observe auto-PEEP in any patient, probably because expiratory time decreased in the same proportion as Vt and ARDS patients typically have very short time constants. A second concern is that higher respiratory rates may favor VILI, as has been shown in experimental data [27, 28]. In fact, although hyperinflation may decrease in magnitude because of the lower Vt, peak inspiratory hyperinflation phenomena occur more frequently because of the compensatory increase in respiratory rate, which could eventually counteract the potential benefit of decreasing Vt. However, the results of the ARDS network tidal volume study suggest that the potential disadvantage of a larger respiratory rate may be largely surpassed by the benefits of a lower Vt [1]. The use of extracorporeal lung support may allow both Vt and respiratory rate to decrease, although it has its own risks.
Another potential disadvantage of further decreasing Vt is a progressive alveolar derecruitment secondary to lower mean and plateau airway pressures. This derecruitment may be prevented by a parallel increase in PEEP levels [6, 29, 30]. However, as we were interested in the isolated impact of Vt on cyclic R/D, we did not modify PEEP levels. Despite keeping PEEP constant and lowering airway pressures, we did not observe an increase in non-aerated tissue in CT. However, CT images were obtained after only 5 minutes of ventilation. It is possible that after a longer period derecruitment could have been observed [29]. Nevertheless, PaO2/FiO2 did not change after 30 minutes of ventilation with 4 ml/kg.
Limitations of the study
As this was designed as a feasibility study, we only tested a short period of ventilation with 4 ml/kg. Before clinical application of such a very low Vt strategy, longer studies should be performed. In addition, although decreasing Vt to 4 ml/kg decreased in 20% cyclic R/D, the absolute magnitude of change was rather small and we did not measure biologic markers of lung injury. A longer protocol would be required to determine if this reduction in cyclic R/D has clinical relevance. Thus, data obtained in this study cannot be directly extrapolated to clinical practice, and although hypothesis-generating, should be interpreted with caution.
A second limitation is the low number of patients studied. We are aware that a larger study may have shown patients who would have developed severe respiratory acidosis or severe hypercapnia with Vt 4 ml/kg. However, our data suggest that cyclic R/D may be decreased with this very low Vt, and could be tolerated in most ARDS patients without inducing severe respiratory acidosis. Even so, as our study population had predominantly moderate ARDS we cannot establish whether patients with more severe forms of ARDS, and who have a larger alveolar dead space, could tolerate being treated with conventional ventilation at Vt 4 ml/kg.
A third limitation is that only pulmonary ARDS patients were included. In our center lung CT scan is not frequently indicated for non-pulmonary ARDS patients so we only had pulmonary ARDS patients included. This limitation determines that our results cannot be generalized to non-pulmonary ARDS patients. However, all patients had a diffuse and bilateral compromise reflecting a real ARDS.
The next challenge is to overcome these limitations by testing a larger number of patients, with more severe forms of ARDS, and for a longer study period. In addition, biologic markers of injury, such as pulmonary and systemic cytokines, must be measured to determine the clinical relevance of the mechanical effects observed.
Conclusions
In this preliminary physiologic study we observed that decreasing Vt from 6 to 4 ml/kg reduces cyclic R/D, hyperinflation, as well as airway pressures. In addition, we showed that by optimizing instrumental dead space and respiratory rate, it is possible to avoid severe hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis, while ventilating ARDS patients with a Vt of 4 ml/kg PBW. However, these findings must be confirmed in larger studies and complemented with assessment of relevant biomarkers of lung injury, before it can be translated to clinical practice.
Key messages
Decreasing tidal volume from 6 to 4 ml/kg reduces cyclic recruitment - derecruitment in ARDS patients
Decreasing tidal volume from 6 to 4 ml/kg reduces hyperinflation and airway pressures
The risk of severe hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis after decreasing tidal volume to 4 ml/kg can be minimized by optimizing instrumental dead space and increasing respiratory rate
Abbreviations
APACHE II:
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II
ARDS:
acute respiratory distress syndrome
AT:
aerated tissue
CT:
computed tomography
HIT:
hyperinflated tissue
HMEF:
heat and moisture exchanging filter
NAT:
non-aerated tissue
PAL:
poorly aerated tissue
PaO2/FiO2:
the ratio of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood and fraction of inspired oxygen
PBW:
predicted body weight
PEEP:
positive end-expiratory pressure
R/D:
recruitment - derecruitment
SOFA:
sequential organ failure assessment
VILI:
ventilator-induced lung injury
Vt:
tidal volume.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant of Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (FONDECYT) 11060350. We thank Victor Avilés, Orlando Concha, Cristián Cabrera and Juan Carlos Tapia for their invaluable help in CT image acquisition.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
(2)
Departamento de Radiología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
References
Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network N Engl J Med 2000, 342: 1301-1308.Google Scholar
Brower RG, Lanken PN, MacIntyre N, Matthay MA, Morris A, Ancukiewicz M, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT: Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome.N Engl J Med 2004, 351: 327-336.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Meade MO, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Slutsky AS, Arabi YM, Cooper DJ, Davies AR, Hand LE, Zhou Q, Thabane L, Austin P, Lapinsky S, Baxter A, Russell J, Skrobik Y, Ronco JJ, Stewart TE: Ventilation strategy using low tidal volumes, recruitment maneuvers, and high positive end-expiratory pressure for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA 2008, 299: 637-645. 10.1001/jama.299.6.637View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Mercat A, Richard JC, Vielle B, Jaber S, Osman D, Diehl JL, Lefrant JY, Prat G, Richecoeur J, Nieszkowska A, Gervais C, Baudot J, Bouadma L, Brochard L: Positive end-expiratory pressure setting in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA 2008, 299: 646-655. 10.1001/jama.299.6.646View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Bruhn A, Bugedo D, Riquelme F, Varas J, Retamal J, Besa C, Cabrera C, Bugedo G: Tidal volume is a major determinant of cyclic recruitment-derecruitment in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Minerva Anestesiol 2011, 77: 418-426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Terragni PP, Del Sorbo L, Mascia L, Urbino R, Martin EL, Birocco A, Faggiano C, Quintel M, Gattinoni L, Ranieri VM: Tidal volume lower than 6 ml/kg enhances lung protection: role of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal.Anesthesiology 2009, 111: 826-835. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b764d2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Terragni PP, Rosboch G, Tealdi A, Corno E, Menaldo E, Davini O, Gandini G, Herrmann P, Mascia L, Quintel M, Slutsky AS, Gattinoni L, Ranieri VM: Tidal hyperinflation during low tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007, 175: 160-166.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Gattinoni L, Carlesso E, Langer T: Towards ultraprotective mechanical ventilation.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2012, 25: 141-147. 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283503125View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Moerer O, Quintel M: Protective and ultra-protective ventilation: using pumpless interventional lung assist (iLA).Minerva Anestesiol 2011, 77: 537-544.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Gernoth C, Wagner G, Pelosi P, Luecke T: Respiratory and haemodynamic changes during decremental open lung positive end-expiratory pressure titration in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.Crit Care 2009, 13: R59. 10.1186/cc7786PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Prin S, Chergui K, Augarde R, Page B, Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A: Ability and safety of a heated humidifier to control hypercapnic acidosis in severe ARDS.Intensive Care Med 2002, 28: 1756-1760. 10.1007/s00134-002-1520-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM, Magaldi RB, Schettino GP, Lorenzi-Filho G, Kairalla RA, Deheinzelin D, Munoz C, Oliveira R, Takagaki TY, Carvalho CR: Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.N Engl J Med 1998, 338: 347-354. 10.1056/NEJM199802053380602View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hickling KG, Henderson SJ, Jackson R: Low mortality associated with low volume pressure limited ventilation with permissive hypercapnia in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome.Intensive Care Med 1990, 16: 372-377. 10.1007/BF01735174View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Gattinoni L, Caironi P, Cressoni M, Chiumello D, Ranieri VM, Quintel M, Russo S, Patroniti N, Cornejo R, Bugedo G: Lung recruitment in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome.N Engl J Med 2006, 354: 1775-1786. 10.1056/NEJMoa052052View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Constantin JM, Grasso S, Chanques G, Aufort S, Futier E, Sebbane M, Jung B, Gallix B, Bazin JE, Rouby JJ, Jaber S: Lung morphology predicts response to recruitment maneuver in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.Crit Care Med 2010, 38: 1108-1117. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d451ecView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS: Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition.JAMA 2012, 307: 2526-2533.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Baumgardner JE, Markstaller K, Pfeiffer B, Doebrich M, Otto CM: Effects of respiratory rate, plateau pressure, and positive end-expiratory pressure on PaO2 oscillations after saline lavage.Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002, 166: 1556-1562. 10.1164/rccm.200207-717OCView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
David M, Karmrodt J, Bletz C, David S, Herweling A, Kauczor HU, Markstaller K: Analysis of atelectasis, ventilated, and hyperinflated lung during mechanical ventilation by dynamic CT.Chest 2005, 128: 3757-3770. 10.1378/chest.128.5.3757View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Halter JM, Steinberg JM, Gatto LA, DiRocco JD, Pavone LA, Schiller HJ, Albert S, Lee HM, Carney D, Nieman GF: Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure and tidal volume on lung injury induced by alveolar instability.Crit Care 2007, 11: R20. 10.1186/cc5695PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Richecoeur J, Lu Q, Vieira SR, Puybasset L, Kalfon P, Coriat P, Rouby JJ: Expiratory washout versus optimization of mechanical ventilation during permissive hypercapnia in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999, 160: 77-85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Prat G, Renault A, Tonnelier JM, Goetghebeur D, Oger E, Boles JM, L'Her E: Influence of the humidification device during acute respiratory distress syndrome.Intensive Care Med 2003, 29: 2211-2215. 10.1007/s00134-003-1926-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Moran I, Bellapart J, Vari A, Mancebo J: Heat and moisture exchangers and heated humidifiers in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Effects on respiratory mechanics and gas exchange.Intensive Care Med 2006, 32: 524-531. 10.1007/s00134-006-0073-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Retamal J, Castillo J, Bugedo G, Bruhn A: Survey of airway humidification in adult intensive care units in Chile.Revista Med Chil 2012, 140: 1425-1430.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ricard JD, Cook D, Griffith L, Brochard L, Dreyfuss D: Physicians' attitude to use heat and moisture exchangers or heated humidifiers: a Franco-Canadian survey.Intensive Care Med 2002, 28: 719-725. 10.1007/s00134-002-1285-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Andrews RJ, Bringas JR, Alonzo G: Cerebrospinal fluid pH and PCO2 rapidly follow arterial blood pH and PCO2 with changes in ventilation.Neurosurgery 1994, 34: 466-470. discussion 470 10.1227/00006123-199403000-00012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Wexler HR, Lok P: A simple formula for adjusting arterial carbon dioxide tension.Can Anaesth Soc J 1981, 28: 370-372. 10.1007/BF03007805View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hotchkiss JR, Blanch L, Murias G, Adams AB, Olson DA, Wangensteen OD, Leo PH, Marini JJ: Effects of decreased respiratory frequency on ventilator-induced lung injury.Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000, 161: 463-468.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Vaporidi K, Voloudakis G, Priniannakis G, Kondili E, Koutsopoulos A, Tsatsanis C, Georgopoulos D: Effects of respiratory rate on ventilator-induced lung injury at a constant PaCO2 in a mouse model of normal lung.Crit Care Med 2008, 36: 1277-1283. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318169f30eView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Cereda M, Foti G, Musch G, Sparacino ME, Pesenti A: Positive end-expiratory pressure prevents the loss of respiratory compliance during low tidal volume ventilation in acute lung injury patients.Chest 1996, 109: 480-485. 10.1378/chest.109.2.480View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Richard JC, Maggiore SM, Jonson B, Mancebo J, Lemaire F, Brochard L: Influence of tidal volume on alveolar recruitment. Respective role of PEEP and a recruitment maneuver.Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001, 163: 1609-1613.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
