Skip to main content

Quality of care in the ICU from the perspective of relatives

Introduction

This study describes the development and validation of the Consumer Quality Index Relatives in ICUs (CQI 'R-ICU'), which aims to measure the satisfaction of relatives and to identify aspect of care that need improvement in the ICU in a reliable and valid way. According to the quality standards of the Dutch Society of Intensive Care, every ICU needs to record the satisfaction of relatives [1]. At this moment there is insufficient insight into the quality of care offered to relatives on the ICU because an evidence-based Dutch measurement instrument is missing.

Methods

The CQI 'R-ICU' has been developed based on a scientific and standardised method [2]. A mixed design method is used, consisting of qualitative and quantitative survey studies. Factor analyses are carried out to determine the underlying structure of the newly developed questionnaire. Multiple regression analysis is used to explore the relationship between demographic variables and the perceived quality of care.

Results

In six hospitals the CQI 'R-ICU' is sent to relatives after receiving informed consent (n = 441), 55.1% of the respondents are the patient's partner. Respondents seem to be most satisfied with the presence of a professional at first entrance to the ICU. The highest need for improvement scores relate to information about meals, parking and other disciplines (for example, social worker, spiritual worker or psychologist). Factor analysis shows that quality of care is determined by four clusters of items: Support, Communication, General Information and Organisation. The reliability of the CQI 'R-ICU' is sufficiently high, only Communication and Support are significant predictors of total quality judgement of relatives (adj. R 2 = 0.74). In addition, there is a significant difference in mean total quality judgement between the six hospitals as well as between the four wards within Erasmus MC. None of the demographic variables such as sex, age, education, race and length of stay had an effect on perceived quality of care.

Conclusion

The CQI 'R-ICU' turned out to be a valid, reliable, sensitive and feasible instrument. Large-scale implementation is recommended.

References

  1. 1.

    Vos, et al.: Quality measurement at intensive care units: which indicators should we use? J Crit Care 2007, 22: 267-274. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.01.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sixma, et al.: Handboek CQI Ontwikkeling: richtlijnen en voorschriften voor de ontwikkeling van een CQI meetinstrument. Utrecht: Nivel; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to researchers of Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Kennemer Gasthuis, Catharinaziekenhuis, Ziekenhuis Rivierenland and Scheperziekenhuis.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Van Mol.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Mol, M., Bakker, E., Rensen, A. et al. Quality of care in the ICU from the perspective of relatives. Crit Care 17, P543 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12481

Download citation

Keywords

  • Multiple Regression Analysis
  • Demographic Variable
  • Quality Index
  • Measurement Instrument
  • Mixed Design