Skip to main content

Alternative to improve palliative care for all patients and families in critical care units: development and preliminary evaluation following MRC guidance of the King's Psychosocial, Assessment and Care tool

Introduction

More than one in five people admitted to an ICU will die there. Research has highlighted concerns about support for patients and families and decision-making in this context [1, 2]. Here, we describe the development and evaluation of a tool to improve palliative care in a 32-bed general ICU in a central London teaching hospital.

Methods

Medical Research Council guidance for complex interventions Phase 0 to I comprised literature review, theoretical modelling, observation and qualitative interviews and focus groups with staffand families exploring concerns and views of interventions identified in the literature review. Phase II comprised intervention development, implementation and evaluation of tool feasibility and effects using staff survey, observation, audit of records and relative survey.

Results

Phase I: 47 staffand 24 family members were interviewed. The short time between decisions for treatment withdrawal and death, plus concerns for support management, communication and decision-making, highlighted a need to ensure excellent psychosocial assessment for all. Phase II: as part of integrated care guidelines, we developed the King's Psychosocial Assessment and Care tool (K-PACE). K-PACE is used for all patients entering the ICU, completed within 24 hours of admission. It contains psychosocial assessment of the family and patient needs, and identifies key individuals for contact. Educational training was supported by K-PACE and was implemented in two waves. Post-implementation survey of 95 ICU stafffound that most (80%) were aware of K-PACE. Eighty-two per cent of nurses but only 17% of doctors had completed the tool. In total, 158/213 (74%) family members responded to the survey (additionally three patients responded). There were high levels of satisfaction for symptom control and psychosocial care but concerns continued regarding explanation of treatment and care.

Conclusion

K-PACE is a feasible tool to improve the palliative care of patients and their families in the ICU. Further refinement is needed and planned, with consideration of roll-out into the wider medical centre.

References

  1. 1.

    Azoulay E, et al.: Half the families of ICU patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med 2000, 28: 3044-3049. 10.1097/00003246-200008000-00061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Asch DA, et al.: Conflicts between physicians' practices and patients' wishes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995, 151: 288-292.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I Higginson.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Higginson, I., Rumble, C., Koffman, J. et al. Alternative to improve palliative care for all patients and families in critical care units: development and preliminary evaluation following MRC guidance of the King's Psychosocial, Assessment and Care tool. Crit Care 17, P528 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12466

Download citation

Keywords

  • Palliative Care
  • Support Management
  • Care Guideline
  • Critical Care Unit
  • Treatment Withdrawal