Skip to main content

Different aspects of therapy limitation: a comparative study of the nurse's view


During the last few years the frequency of end-of-life decisions (EOLD) significantly increased in ICUs. The method of nurse involvement in making EOLD is different worldwide [1, 2]. The purpose of this study was to analyze opinions of nurses about therapy restriction. We have examined with a multicenter study the opinions of the medical stuff about end-of-life care in Hungarian ICUs.


We performed a questionnaire evaluation among physicians and nurses of ICUs about influencing factors of therapy restriction, the method of the decision-making process, and the frequency of different EOLD. The questionnaire, containing 21 questions, was delivered electronically to Hungarian ICUs, and then we analyzed the responses anonymously. The retrieved 302 answers (191 physicians, 102 nurses) were analysed using a nonparametric Student's test.


A total 71% of the nurse responders work in university clinics, 2% in regional centrum, 24% in municipal hospital, 3% in other ICUs. The nurses found both human (2.72/5 vs. 1.98/5) and material (2.81/5 vs. 2.12/5) resources more restrictive factors during patient admission than physicians (P = 0.025, P = 0.0024). Nurses working in municipal hospital were more strongly influenced by lack of material and human resources (3.34/5, 3.3/5) than nurses working in university clinics (2.2/5, 2.43/5), P = 0.01, P = 0.025. Younger nurses (working between 6 and 10 years) were more interested in the patient's or surrogate's wishes than older nurses (working more than 10 years). Religion did not influence patient admission and forego therapy; however, religious nurses compared with atheists and nonpracticing believers preferred to prolong therapy against the patient's will (P = 0.04). Nurses felt that physicians slightly involved them in the end-of-life decision-making process (2.1/5 vs. 2.4/5 P = 0.0001).


We found that the workplace, level of medical attendance, godliness, work experience, and position in medical staffstrongly influenced making EOLD. While limitation of the therapy should be team work, nurses felt their opinions were hardly taken into consideration, although nurses seemed to be more realistic in the decision-making process.


  1. 1.

    Prendergast, et al.: A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998, 158: 1165-1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Banbenishty, et al.: Nurse involvement in end-of-life decision making: the ETHICUS Study. Intensive Care Med 2006, 32: 129-132. 10.1007/s00134-005-2864-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to O Szücs.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szücs, O., Élö, G., Szabó, L. et al. Different aspects of therapy limitation: a comparative study of the nurse's view. Crit Care 17, P527 (2013).

Download citation


  • Human Resource
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Multicenter Study
  • Influence Factor
  • Medical Attendance