- Poster presentation
- Open access
- Published:
Efficacy of calcium replacement in hypocalcaemia
Critical Care volume 17, Article number: P449 (2013)
Introduction
The aim of the study is to examine the efficacy of calcium replacement in patients with hypocalcaemia in the ICU. Hypocalcaemia affects between 15 and 50% of admissions to the ICU [1].
Methods
Adjusted calcium results <2.0 mmol/l were followed up from admission for 5 days or until discharge or death. On each day the adjusted calcium result and the calcium replacement were documented. Adequate replacement is defined as 40 ml of 10% calcium gluconate if the adjusted calcium is <2.0 mmol/l and 20 ml of 10% calcium gluconate if the adjusted calcium result is between 2.0 and 2.15 mmol/l.
Results
Eighty-eight adjusted calcium results were <2.0 mmol/l. In 74 results adequate replacement was given and the average increase in calcium was 0.2 mmol/l. This led to an increase in the adjusted calcium to >2.15 mmol/l in 36% of results and improvement to >2.0 mmol/l in 89% of results. In 14 results no replacement was given and the average increase in calcium was 0.07 mmol/l, which equated to 57% of calcium results remaining <2.0 mmol/l. Unpaired t test showed a P value of 0.0006. A total of 150 adjusted calcium results were between 2.0 and 2.15 mmol/l. In 111 results adequate replacement was given and the average increase was 0.006 mmol/l. The adjusted calcium fell to <2.0 mmol/l in 26% of results and normalised to >2.15 mmol/l in 23%. Where the adjusted calcium fell despite replacement, 51% of results were below 2.05 mmol/l. In 39 results no replacement was given, leading to an average fall in calcium of 0.03 mmol/l. Thirty-three percent of calcium results fell to <2.0 mmol/l and 20% of results normalised. Unpaired t test showed a P value of 0.07.
Conclusion
Calcium replacement with 40 ml of 10% calcium gluconate is effective when the adjusted calcium is <2.0 mmol/l. Replacement with 20 ml of 10% calcium gluconate when the adjusted calcium is between 2.0 and 2.15 mmol/l is not much more effective than no replacement. This suggests that either replacement is not needed or there is under-replacement in mild hypocalcaemia. Adjusted calcium may be giving falsely low calcium results in mild hypocalcaemia. The measurement of ionised calcium is a possible solution [2, 3].
References
Zaloga GP: Crit Care Med. 1992, 20: 251-262. 10.1097/00003246-199202000-00014
Slomp J, et al.: Crit Care Med. 2003, 31: 1389-1393. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000063044.55669.3C
Byrnes MC, et al.: Am J Surg. 2005, 189: 310-314. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.11.017
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Chatha, H., Sim, K. Efficacy of calcium replacement in hypocalcaemia. Crit Care 17 (Suppl 2), P449 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12387
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12387