Skip to main content
  • Poster presentation
  • Open access
  • Published:

Survival analysis after head injury: is a normal INR reassuring?

Introduction

Intracranial bleeding after head injury is an important issue in the emergency department (ED), and elevated INR increases this risk [1]. A retrospective study showed an association between different levels of normal INRs (<1.6) and elevated risk of intracranial bleeding, with a significant elevation of this risk over an INR threshold of 1.3 [2]. The objective of the study was to evaluate clinical impact of an INR within the normal range in patients with head trauma. We compared mortality between patients with INR <1.3 and those with INR ≥1.3 to <1.6.

Methods

A post hoc analysis of prospective data collected from 3,356 patients seen in a tertiary-care ED from March 2008 to February 2011. We included patients aged 16 years old and over with an INR <1.6 and a head CT performed within 24 hours of the trauma. We followed these patients until December 2012, performed a chi-square test between mortality of the two groups and calculated the hazard ratio (HR) from survival analysis using Cox regression.

Results

Patient mean age was 55.1 years (SD ±23), 65% were men and mean follow-up duration was 3.1 years (SD ±0.8). A total of 115 patients (15.9%) died during follow-up: 16 (36.4%) in the group with INR ≥1.3 and 99 (14.6%) in the group with INR <1.3 (P < 0.001). Results showed a significantly higher risk of death in the group with INR ≥1.3: HR = 2.99 (95% CI = 1.8 to 5.1); P < 0.001 (Figure 1).

Conclusion

In patients with head injury and normal INR (<1.6), there is an association between an INR ≥1.3 and higher risk of death. Therefore, it would be useful to request an INR in patients presenting with a head injury when bleeding is suspected, even in the absence of anticoagulant.

Figure 1
figure 1

Survival analysis of patients with INR <1.3 and with INR ≥1.3.

References

  1. Lingsma HF, et al.: Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictions. Lancet Neurol 2010, 9: 543-554. 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70065-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chauny JM, et al.Non Elevated INR and Post Traumatic Intracranial Bleeding. Day of Research in Neurotraumatology. Montreal: Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur; 22 June 2012

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leclerc-Gagne, K. Survival analysis after head injury: is a normal INR reassuring?. Crit Care 17 (Suppl 2), P336 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12274

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12274

Keywords