Skip to main content
  • Poster presentation
  • Open access
  • Published:

Intravenous paracetamol for fever control in acute brain-injured patients: cerebral and hemodynamic effects

Introduction

Fever is a dangerous secondary insult for the injured brain [1]. We investigated the cerebral and hemodynamic effects of intravenous (i.v.) paracetamol administration for the control of fever in neurointensive care unit (NICU) patients.

Methods

The i.v. paracetamol (1 g in 15 minutes) was administered to NICU patients with a body temperature (Temp.) >37.5°C. Its effects on mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), jugular venous oxygen saturation (SjVO2) and Temp. were recorded at the start of paracetamol infusion (T0) and after 30 (T30), 60 (T60) and 120 (T120) minutes. Interventions for the maintenance of CPP >60 mmHg or ICP <20 mmHg were recorded.

Results

Fifteen NICU patients (nine subarachnoid hemorrhage, five traumatic brain injury, mean age 54.9 ± 16.8, seven (50%) males, median GCS 7) were prospectively studied. We analyzed the administration of one dose of paracetamol for each patient (total 14 cases). After infusion of paracetamol we found a decrease of Temp. (from 37.8 ± 0.3 to 37.4 ± 0.4°C, P < 0.001), MAP (from 94.7 ± 9.9 to 86.1 ± 6.7 mmHg, P = 0.008), CPP (from 79.6 ± 13.1 to 70.8 ± 7.6 mmHg, P = 0.011) and HR (from 71.5 ± 14.9 to 63.8 ± 16.3 bpm, P < 0.001) with respect to the starting value (ANOVA for repeated measures), whereas ICP and SjVO2 remained unchanged (Figure 1). In five cases norepinephrine infusion was started for CPP <60 mmHg. In another two cases, for the same reason, the norepinephrine dosage was augmented. The proportion of patients who had infusion of norepinephrine increased from 42.8% at T0 to 78.6% at T120 (P = 0.02, chi-square for trends).

Conclusion

Use of i.v. paracetamol is effective in the maintenance of normothermia in acute brain-injured patients. However, adverse hemodynamic effects, which could represent a secondary insult for the injured brain, must be rapidly recognized and treated.

Figure 1
figure 1

* P < 0.05 versus T0.

References

  1. Greer DM, Funk SE, Reaven NL, Ouzounelli M, Uman GC: Impact of fever on outcome in patients with stroke and neurologic injury. Stroke 2008, 39: 3029-3035. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Picetti, E., Rossi, I., Ceccarelli, P. et al. Intravenous paracetamol for fever control in acute brain-injured patients: cerebral and hemodynamic effects. Crit Care 17 (Suppl 2), P329 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12267

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12267

Keywords