Skip to main content

Fluid responsiveness in pressure support ventilation: role of asynchrony

Introduction

Pulse pressure variation (PPV) is a dynamic indicator of fluid responsiveness, which is known to have a low sensibility and specificity in patients ventilated in pressure support (PS) [1]. We aim to investigate patient-ventilator asynchrony as a potential source of hemodynamic interference in PS.

Methods

We performed a prospective study including PS ventilated patients who met inclusion criteria for fluid depletion [1]. Patients who showed an asynchrony index (AI) exceeding 10% were included in the asynchrony group (AG). The remaining patients were included in the synchrony group (SG) [2]. Beat-to-beat hemodynamic variables were recorded through PRAM (Mostcare; Vytech Health srl, Padova, Italy). PPV cutoff of 13% was used to identify fluid responders/nonresponders. A fluid challenge of 500 ml normal saline was given in 5 minutes. An increase of 15% of cardiac index after 10 minutes indicated fluid responsiveness.

Results

So far, eights patients showed an AI >10% while 16 did not. Overall sensitivity was 28.6% versus 50% in SG; overall specificity was 76.5% versus 91.7% in AG. Overall Cohen's k was 33.3% versus 61.2% in AG (see Figure 1). However, because none of the responders in the AG group was detected by PPV, statistical analysis was not feasible within this subgroup

Figure 1
figure1

.

Conclusion

The consistency of PPV in predicting fluid responsiveness during PS seems to be more reliable in the patients with better patient-ventilator synchrony.

References

  1. 1.

    Heenen S, et al.: Crit Care. 2006, 10: R102. 10.1186/cc4970

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Vitacca M, et al.: Chest. 2004, 126: 851-859. 10.1378/chest.126.3.851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Messina.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Messina, A., Colombo, D., Cammarota, G. et al. Fluid responsiveness in pressure support ventilation: role of asynchrony. Crit Care 17, P202 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12140

Download citation

Keywords

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Normal Saline
  • Cardiac Index
  • Support Ventilation
  • Pressure Support