Skip to main content

FiO2/PEEP index: a simple tool for opitimizing ventilator settings

Introduction

During mechanical ventilation, oxygenation can be influenced by adjusting FiO2 and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). There have been recommendations for how the FiO2 and PEEP should be set [1]. However, in a recent audit we found that the compliance of doctors of these recommendations is very low [2]. Therefore we invented a simple parameter called the FiO2/PEEP index (FPi) of which the physiologic value is ≤7 (that is, FiO2 = 21%/PEEP = 3 cmH2O), which corresponds to the ARDSNet trial's minimum FiO2/PEEP settings: 35%/5 cmH2O [2]. The aim of this case-control study was to investigate the impact of an FPi ≤7 targeted protocol on clinical practice.

Methods

A prospective observational study in 2010 and 2012. Every mechanically ventilated patient was recruited. Demographics, outcome data and Lung Injury Score (LIS) were recorded after admission. Respiratory settings, oxygenation and ventilation parameters were recorded after mechanical ventilation was commenced and the first arterial blood gas sample was taken (T0). Measurements were repeated in 24 hours (T1). Data are presented as mean ± SD, paired-sample and independent-sample t test and chi-square tests were used for statistics.

Results

In 2010, 75 patients, and in 2012, 130 patients were included. There was no difference in demographics, disease severity, but LIS was higher in 2012: 1.34 ± 1.13 versus 0.84 ± 0.98, P = 0.001. There was no significant difference in FPi between the two groups at T0: 10.91 ± 4.25 versus 10.26 ± 5.01 (2012 vs. 2010, respectively). At T24 the FPi was significantly lower in 2012 as compared with 2010: 7.28 ± 2.58 versus 8.17 ± 3.3, P = 0.001; which was due to the higher PEEP applied: 7.08 ± 2.87 versus 6.63 ± 2.91, P = 0.014. Although in 2012 significantly more patients, 112 (86%), were ventilated with FiO2 ≥50% at T0 as compared with 2010, 44 (58%) (P = 0.001), by T24 significantly less patients received FiO2 ≥50%, 46 (35%) vs. 34 (45%) (P = 0.011). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding FiO2, PaO2 and PaCO2 at T0 and T24.

Conclusion

Implementing an FPi ≤7-based algorithm significantly reduced the FiO2 and increased the PEEP applied in mechanically ventilated within the first 24 hours. Whether this has any impact on earlier weaning due to reaching the weaning criteria of FiO2 sooner, and as a result shortening the duration of mechanical ventilation, has to be investigated in the future.

References

  1. 1.

    ARDSNt: N Engl J Med. 2000, 342: 1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kiss K, et al.: Intensive Care Med. 2011, 37(Suppl 2):S195.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D Trasy.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trasy, D., Nemeth, M., Kiss, K. et al. FiO2/PEEP index: a simple tool for opitimizing ventilator settings. Crit Care 17, P90 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12028

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Prospective Observational Study
  • Ventilator Setting
  • Simple Tool
  • Simple Parameter