Hospital-acquired bloodstream infection: Indian perspective
Critical Care volume 17, Article number: P48 (2013)
This is a 1-year prospective study to determine the incidence, source and etiology of hospital-acquired bloodstream infection (HABSI) in the Indian context. The resistance pattern was also reviewed.
A single-centre prospective study in a 35-bed ICU. HABSI was defined according to current CDC guidelines. HCAP, catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI) and skin-related infections causing BSI was also defined according to recent guidelines and analysed.
Out of 332 positive samples, 90 samples (n = 45) were HABSI. The microbiological analysis showed 60% were Gram-negative, 6% were candida and 27% were Gram-positive. The commonest isolate was klebsiella and MRSA was commonest in Gram-positive. The source of HABSI showed CRBSI was the commonest cause at 69%, which correlates with international data. Ventilator-associated pneumonia and CAUTI caused 9.5% BSI respectively. The resistance pattern among Gram-negative bacteria showed multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extreme drug-resistant (XDR) isolates were highest. See Tables 1 and 2.
The incidence of HABSI is 27%. Of this, CRBSI cause 70% and Gram-negative bacteria were commonest with high resistance. This is in contrast to western data where Gram-positive infections are common. Our study highlights need for stringent guidelines for CRBSI prevention.
Richard , et al.: Crit Care Med. 1999, 27: 887-892. 10.1097/00003246-199905000-00020
Valles , et al.: J Infect. 2008, 56: 27-34. 10.1016/j.jinf.2007.10.001
About this article
Cite this article
Agrawal, R., Varma, A. Hospital-acquired bloodstream infection: Indian perspective. Crit Care 17 (Suppl 2), P48 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11986
- Resistance Pattern
- Microbiological Analysis
- International Data
- Recent Guideline
- Indian Context