Skip to content

Advertisement

Critical Care

Open Access

Optimization of oxygen delivery during high-risk surgery: keeping the concept but refining goals for inotrope infusion?

Critical Care201216:409

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11148

Published: 6 February 2012

Keywords

DobutamineOxygen DeliveryMixed Venous Oxygen SaturationCentral Venous Oxygen SaturationOxygen Debt

We read with great interest the study by Lobo and colleagues [1] in a recent issue of Critical Care. The authors stated that fluid restriction during optimization of oxygen delivery (DO2) using dobutamine improves patient outcome after major surgery. Previous studies have shown that hemodynamic optimization using either an individualized goal-directed fluid substitution or an inotrope to maximize DO2 reduces postoperative morbidity and hospital length of stay [2]. Although the study by Lobo and colleagues sheds new light on the use of an inotrope during major surgery, we believe that the approach they support raises some unanswered questions.

Our main concern is about using a specific target value for DO2 - that is, an oxygen delivery index (DO2i) of greater than 600 mL/minute per m2. It must be emphasized that the treatment goal for DO2i was achieved in only a tiny proportion of patients while using high-dose infusions. Also, it may be somewhat confusing for readers to support the benefit of maximizing DO2 while a better outcome was obtained despite slightly lower levels of DO2i (though the levels were not significantly lower). One can therefore question the rationale of 'maximization' rather than use an individualized approach of tissue O2 needs.

Adequacy of tissue oxygenation is defined by a DO2 adapted to O2 demand [3]. However, the optimal value of DO2 to meet O2 needs is unknown because of its relationship to metabolic demand and individual variations of the critical DO2 [2]. Therefore, we believe that it is better to address the need for inotrope infusion given the VO2-to-DO2 (oxygen consumption-to-oxygen delivery) relationship (that is, the O2 extraction) or the VCO2-to-DO2 (carbon dioxide production-to-oxygen delivery) relationship (or both) [4] rather than to target any specific value for DO2 [3]. Such an approach would help reduce the amount of fluid infused while allowing an individualized inotrope infusion [5].

Authors' response

Suzana M Lobo, Paulo G Brandão and Francisco R Lobo

We thank Futier and Vallet for addressing some issues in our study. We certainly agree that the goal of 600 mL/minute per m2 is, to a certain extent, troublesome and that an individualized hemodynamic approach would be more coherent. However, given the findings of two systematic reviews on the use of pre-emptive hemodynamic intervention in high-risk surgical patients [6, 7], we accept that DO2, instead of the VO2-to-DO2 relationship, should be the goal of therapy. The review by Hamilton and colleagues [6] included 29 studies involving 4,805 patients. The authors showed significant reductions in mortality by using cardiac index or DO2 as endpoints and not for other goals. Gurgel and do Nascimento [7] reported that therapies directed at increasing central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) or mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) did not significantly reduce mortality. During surgery, many factors influence VO2 and not all are indicative of hypoperfusion [8]. Anesthesia determines a marked decrease in VO2 and carbon dioxide production reflecting reduction in whole-body metabolism.

The critical DO2 is the point below which the dependence between DO2 and VO2 is observed and this point varies for different organs [9]. Regional hypoperfusion may occur despite normal global oxygen extraction rate. In our view, it is not the achievement of the '600' value that determines better outcomes. Rather, what might count is keeping DO2 above baseline while trying to reach this number and, as a consequence, prevent oxygen debt. By targeting a supranormal value, we actually increase the likelihood of having more patients without oxygen debt and for longer periods. In addition, doses of inotropes were not so high and there were no adverse events related to their use. Many changes will come with new knowledge, and still it seems to us that Shoemaker and colleagues [10], who more than 20 years ago reported the close correlation between DO2 and the development of multiple organ failure and death, are right.

Abbreviations

DO2

oxygen delivery

DO2

i: oxygen delivery index

VO2

oxygen consumption.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The statements in this letter do not support the use of a specific treatment protocol or a specific medical device for perioperative goal-directed strategies.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Estaing Hospital, University hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, France
(2)
Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France

References

  1. Lobo SM, Ronchi LS, Oliveira NE, Brandao PG, Froes A, Cunrath GS, Mishiyama KG, Netinho JG, Lobo FR: Restrictive strategy of intra-operative fluid maintenance during optimization of oxygen delivery decreases major complications after high-risk surgery. Crit Care 2011, 15: R226. 10.1186/cc10466PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lees N, Hamilton M, Rhodes A: Clinical review: goal-directed therapy in high risk surgical patients. Crit Care 2009, 13: 231. 10.1186/cc8039PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Vallet B, Futier E: Perioperative oxygen therapy and oxygen utilization. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010, 16: 359-364. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32833bfa3bView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Vallet B: Intravascular volume expansion: which surrogate markers could help the clinician to assess improved tissue perfusion? Anesth Analg 2011, 112: 258-259. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182066299View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Donati A, Loggi S, Preiser JC, Orsetti G, Munch C, Gabbanelli V, Pelaia P, Pietropaoli P: Goal-directed intraoperative therapy reduces morbidity and length of hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients. Chest 2007, 132: 1817-1824. 10.1378/chest.07-0621View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Anal 2011, 112: 1392-1402. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181eeaae5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Gurgel ST, do Nascimento P Jr: Maintaining tissue perfusion in high-risk surgical patients: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Anesth Analg 2011, 12: 1384-1391.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Shepherd SJ, Pearse RM: Role of central and mixed venous oxygen saturation measurement in perioperative care. Anesthesiology 2009, 111: 649-656. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181af59aaView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Van Bommel J, Trouwborst A, Schwarte L, Siegemund M, Ince C, Henny ChP: Intestinal and cerebral oxygenation during severe isovolemic hemodilution and subsequent hyperoxic ventilation in a pig model. Anesthesiology 2002, 97: 660-670. 10.1097/00000542-200209000-00021View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB, Waxman K, Lee T: Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high risk surgical patients. Chest 1988, 94: 1176-1185. 10.1378/chest.94.6.1176View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2012

Advertisement