Skip to main content

Quality and value of intensive care discharge summaries for general practitioners


Good communication between healthcare professionals is required to provide continuity of care for patients being discharged from the ICU [1]. It is our unit's practice to send a copy of a patient's computerized ICU discharge summary to both the hospital team with ongoing responsibility and to their general practitioner (GP). The aim of this study was to establish and compare the quality and value of the summaries as judged by ICU doctors and GPs.


Discharge summaries for patients admitted in July 2011 were obtained from the ICU WardWatcher® database. These were scored independently by two ICU consultants and a trainee doctor using a predefined rating scale. The GPs were sent postal questionnaires regarding their perceptions of the quality and value of the summaries. A comparison was made between the ratings made by the ICU team and the responses to the GP questionnaires.


Sixty patients were admitted during the study period. All 60 summaries were independently rated by three ICU doctors and good inter-rater reliability was demonstrated (Cronbach's α = 0.89). There was a strong correlation between the ratings given by the ICU consultants and the trainee doctor (Spearman's = 0.91). Twenty-eight per cent achieved an acceptable score of 6 out of 10 or greater (median score 5, interquartile range 3 to 6). Fifty-four postal questionnaires were sent to GPs and 36 were returned (response rate 67%). Seventy-six per cent achieved an acceptable score of 16 out of 25 or greater (median score 18, interquartile range 16 to 25). Sixty-nine per cent of GPs found the discharge summary helpful and 86% wanted to be sent this type of summary in future. Correlation between the ICU team rating and the GP score for the summaries was weakly positive (Spearman's = 0.15).


Although only 28% of discharge summaries achieved an acceptable or higher rating from the ICU team, GPs valued the majority of discharge summaries issued by our ICU. Further research is needed to explain the difference between ICU doctors' perception of discharge summary quality and the value provided by them to GPs.


  1. 1.

    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence:Clinical Guideline 83: Rehabilitation after Critical Illness. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2009. []

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daruwalla, F., Lamb, F. & Mearns, C. Quality and value of intensive care discharge summaries for general practitioners. Crit Care 16, P520 (2012).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • General Practitioner
  • Median Score
  • Postal Questionnaire
  • Discharge Summary
  • Team Rating