- Poster presentation
- Open access
- Published:
Families: the newest members of the ICU multidisciplinary team
Critical Care volume 16, Article number: P495 (2012)
Introduction
We have started inviting the relatives of our patients to remain present during our multidisciplinary team ICU ward round. The aim is to improve their understanding of the complex activity on an ICU and reduce inconsistencies in communication. In the UK it is becoming expected practice that patient satisfaction is an endpoint we should be measuring and improving [1]. Assessing this on the ICU is often very difficult due to the confounding factors inherent to critical illness. We often seek assent from families for procedures and to provide some history as a surrogate to patient interview. We think the care we provide should encompass both the patient and their family. This is already accepted practice in the paediatric ICU setting [2]. Communication between family and clinical staff, ideally on a daily basis, is clearly imperative and a systematic approach to improve this is good practice. Increasing insight into relatives' perceptions and expectations will aid the delivery of high-quality care. We believe that involving relatives in the ward round will be of benefit for us in our professional relationships with them and improve their understanding during an extremely difficult time.
Methods
This was a prospective study over 2 months formally inviting up to four families per day to be present for that part of the ward round involving their relative. Subsequently they were asked to complete a questionnaire anonymously on the experience.
Results
The results that reflected 31 ward round attendances were unanimous: every family agreed that their attendance had a positive impact, alleviating misconceptions about the intensive care environment and clarifying the processes involved in the care of their relative. The survey also revealed that attendance at the ward round provided an excellent opportunity to have their questions answered by consultants. All those invited wished to attend and all respondents said the experience was valuable and they would like to attend again. Comments included: 'Explanations very helpful to deal with the stress of the situation' and 'Reassuring to have information delivered professionally and compassionately'.
Conclusion
In this single-centre survey we have demonstrated that inviting families to ICU ward rounds is feasible and we believe that this intervention could improve family satisfaction on the ICU. We are investigating the impact of this intervention with a detailed comparative survey, which we will present in the future.
References
Patient Satisfaction. [http://www.patientsatisfaction.co.uk]
Aronson , et al: Paediatrics. 2009, 124: 1120-1125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Santhirapala, R., Lipton, J., Hall, T. et al. Families: the newest members of the ICU multidisciplinary team. Crit Care 16 (Suppl 1), P495 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11102
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11102