Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

New severity score of acute respiratory failure

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Critical Care201216 (Suppl 1) :P415

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11022

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Acute Respiratory Failure
  • Ventilatory Support
  • Blinded Manner
  • Specific Score
  • Healthy Lung

Introduction

Acute respiratory failure (ARF), a common syndrome, is still poorly clinically appreciated. Literature review reports only a few attempts in neonatology (Silverman score) and in adults (Patrick score [1]) constructed by authors in 1996 for scientific research purposes. Both scores have never been validated. Instead, clinicians developed specific scores. We constructed a new respiratory failure score, organized in a trimodal manner (Table 1). Items were selected on the basis of pathophysiological and clinical expertise. Particular attention was paid to formulation and scaling to make the score both simple, noninvasive, inexpensive, didactic, and with interesting clinimetric properties. The objective of this study is to validate this score already in use for several years in our ICU.
Table 1

Score of respiratory failure

Grade

Respiratory rate

Accessory muscle use

Hypoxemia

I

<30

Intercostal

Normal

II

30 to 40

Supraclavicular and/or suprasternal

Cyanosis

III

>40

Thoraco-abdominal

Circulatory and/or

  

swing/nasal flaring

consciousness disorders

IV

Gasp

Exhaustion/ventilatory arrest

Cardio-circulatory arrest

Methods

A prospective study among 70 patients with ARF on previously healthy lungs. ARF was rated in a randomized blinded manner respectively by residents and seniors. An inter-rater reliability analysis using the kappa statistic was performed to determine consistency among raters. Clinimetric properties were assessed by examining the prognostic prediction by the ROC curve using a composite gold standard (PaO2/FiO2 <250 and/or ventilatory support).

Results

The inter-rater reliability for the raters was found to be κ = 0.82 (P < 0.001), indicating an almost perfect agreement [2]. The area under the ROC curve was revealed very interesting (AUC = 0.88) indicating an excellent prognostic predictive power.

Conclusion

This new and validated score could drive some advantages in daily practice, allowing accurate assessment of ARF severity, more objective monitoring of patients and easier communication between care providers. It may accurately guide oxygen supplementation and ventilatory support and afford accurate monitoring of patho-physiological and etiological treatment of ARF. It could be a valuable tool in randomized clinical trials or physiological studies evaluating treatments in ARF. Finally it could be used as an educational tool.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
CHU Farhat Hached Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia

References

  1. Patrick W, Webster K, Ludwig L, Roberts D, Wiebe P, Younes M: Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory distress without prior chronic respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996, 153: 1005-1011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33: 159-174. 10.2307/2529310View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement