- Poster presentation
- Open access
- Published:
Comparison of cold crystalloid and colloid infusions for induction of therapeutic hypothermia
Critical Care volume 16, Article number: P282 (2012)
Introduction
While cold crystalloids have been used for induction of therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest [1, 2], the effectiveness of cold colloids has not so far been evaluated. Therefore, we investigated the cooling effect of rapid intravenous infusion of cold crystalloid compared to colloid in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation (VF).
Methods
VF was electrically induced in 22 anesthetized domestic pigs (33 ± 2 kg). Defibrillation was attempted after 15 minutes CPR using the AutoPulse (Zoll Medical, USA) and artificial ventilation. After spontaneous circulation was restored, the animals were randomized to receive either 1,500 ml of 1°C cold normal saline (group A; n = 9) within 20 minutes using a Zoll Power Infuser, or 1,500 ml of 1°C cold Voluven (6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in 0.9% NaCl) (group B; n = 9), or no infusion (group C; n = 4). The animals were observed for 90 minutes following infusion. Cerebral, rectal, intramuscular, pulmonary artery, and subcutaneous fat body temperatures (BT) were continuously recorded using GES 130 temperature probes and GMH 3250 digital thermometers (Greisinger Electronic, Germany). Data were analyzed with JMP 3.2 software (SAS Institute, USA) and are expressed as a mean ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
In total, 46.6 ± 3.2 ml/kg cold normal saline was infused in group A, and 45.7 ± 2.7 ml/kg cold colloid in group B. The animals treated with cold fluids achieved a significant decrease of BT in all measurement sites while there was a spontaneous increase in group C (P < 0.05). At the time of finishing infusion there was a greater decrease in cerebral and pulmonary artery BT in group A compared to group B (-1.7 ± 0.4 vs. -1.1 ± 0.3 °C, P = 0.002; and -2.1 ± 0.3 vs. -1.6 ± 0.2 °C, P < 0.001 respectively). Area under the curve analysis of the decrease in intracerebral BT revealed a more vigorous cooling effect in group A compared to B (-91 ± 30 vs. -62 ± 27 °C/minute, P = 0.047). There was also a higher calculated enthalpy for crystalloid solution compared to colloid in the time-point of maximal BT decrease (33.9 ± 5.7 vs. 26.6 ± 3.4 kJ/kg, P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Cold crystalloid infusions resulted in a more intense cooling effect than colloid infusions of the same temperature and infusion rate in this porcine model of cardiac arrest.
References
Kim F, et al: Circulation. 2007, 115: 3064-3070. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.655480.
Skulec R, et al: Crit Care. 2010, 14: R231-10.1186/cc9386.
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by grant MZO 00179906.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Skulec, R., Truhlar, A., Turek, Z. et al. Comparison of cold crystalloid and colloid infusions for induction of therapeutic hypothermia. Crit Care 16 (Suppl 1), P282 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10889
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10889