- Poster presentation
- Open access
- Published:
Therapeutic hypothermia in an out-of-hospital arrest population: are we selecting appropriately?
Critical Care volume 16, Article number: P280 (2012)
Introduction
We question how appropriately we select patients to undergo therapeutic hypothermia following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Methods
The population was identified through searching Wardwatcher between August 2006 and February 2011. Inclusion criteria were all patients with an ICU admission of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Exclusion criteria were: no CPR within the preceding 24 hours; admission from theatre; insufficient data. Data were gathered from Wardwatcher, Careview and patients' case notes for age, arrest rhythm, downtime (DT) - time from arrest to return of spontaneous circulation, time to initiation of CPR, temperatures at various time points, cause of arrest and outcome. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher's exact test, significance level of P < 0.05. Permission for use of patient notes was granted from the consultant group of the ICU audited.
Results
Seventy patients had a hospital admission of post-cardiac arrest. Five failed the inclusion criteria and six fulfilled exclusion criteria. A total of 36 (51%) were cooled (Table 1). Twelve (33%) of the cooled population survived to hospital discharge (D/C), one (8%) cooled within 4 hours, three (25%) cooled for over 12 hours. Ten (28%) patients were cooled despite not having a cardiac cause. One (4%) of the 23 noncooled patients survived to hospital discharge, four (17%) had a cardiac cause. The median age of cooled population was 66 years (quartile range 53.5 to 74 years) and 44 years (quartile range 41 to 52 years) of the noncooled.
Conclusion
Survival is improved in patients cooled post-out-of-hospital cardiac arrest [1, 2]. Downtime is statistically significant in the survival of cooled patients. Achieving optimal timing of cooling was no better in surviving versus dying populations. Cooling post-out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is expensive and time-consuming; selection criteria need to be evaluated to concentrate this resource on patients where there is a higher prospect of a positive outcome [2].
References
Holzer M, et al: Crit Care Med. 2005, 33: 414-418. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000153410.87750.53.
Hay A, et al: Anaesthesia. 2008, 63: 15-19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Short, A., Brett, M. & Donaldson, L. Therapeutic hypothermia in an out-of-hospital arrest population: are we selecting appropriately?. Crit Care 16 (Suppl 1), P280 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10887
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10887