Skip to main content

Prediction of fluid responsiveness in intensive care (PREFERENCE study): fluid challenge versus passive leg raising in high-risk surgical patients

Introduction

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the passive leg raising (PLR) maneuver could be used to predict fluid responsiveness in awake postoperative patients admitted to the ICU. PLR has been demonstrated to be a good indicator of fluid responsiveness even in spontaneously breathing patients, but few data are available in the immediate postoperative period. Nexfin is a new cardiac output monitor that measures and tracks stroke volume (SV) by analyzing the arterial pressure pulse contour noninvasively from a finger probe.

Methods

We enrolled self-ventilating patients admitted to the ICU postoperatively. A PLR maneuver (45° bed tilt from the 30 to 45° head up) was performed and followed by a fluid challenge (FC, 250 ml fluid bolus over 5 minutes). Changes in SV during PLR and after administration of FC were monitored with the Nexfin monitor. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed.

Results

Forty-five patients were enrolled. Twenty-three patients responded to the FC with an increase of SV >5%. Twenty-eight patients (62%) were excluded from the PLR analysis as a result of haemodynamic instability (difference in heart rate, mean arterial pressure or SV baselines pre PLR and pre FC >5%). Seventeen patients were analyzed. The area under the curve for the ROC analysis was 0.93 (SE = 0.06; P = 0.003) (Figure 1). A SV increase >1% during a PLR test predicts a SV increase >5% after FC with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 78%.

figure1

Figure 1

Conclusion

In 62% of patients a PLR test could not be performed due to haemodynamic instability. In these patients, FC is the best way to assess fluid responsiveness. During haemodynamic stability PLR shows great sensitivity and specificity to predict fluid responsiveness. The Nexfin monitor can be used to track SV changes both during FC and during a PLR test.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Cecconi.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cecconi, M., Caliandro, F., Mellinghoff, J. et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in intensive care (PREFERENCE study): fluid challenge versus passive leg raising in high-risk surgical patients. Crit Care 16, P239 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10846

Download citation

Keywords

  • Stroke Volume
  • Fluid Responsiveness
  • Fluid Challenge
  • Pulse Contour
  • Haemodynamic Instability