Skip to main content
  • Poster presentation
  • Open access
  • Published:

Difference between continuous positive airway pressure via mask therapy plus chest physiotherapy (CPT) and incentive spirometry therapy plus CPT to treat or prevent acute atelectasis after cardiac surgery

Introduction

All types of therapy such as an incentive spirometry (IS) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) have a valuable role to play in the prevention or the treatment of acute atelectasis. However, the type of therapy that should be used is not yet completely clear. This study aims to clarify the difference in effectiveness between CPAP therapy plus chest physiotherapy (CPT) and IS therapy plus CPT to treat or prevent acute atelectasis.

Methods

Seventy-two patients who fit the inclusive criteria (smoker, hemodynamically stable, normal lung and above 50 years old) participated in this study. The participants were divided randomly into two groups: the control group used IS 15 times per hour plus CPT 4 hours for 3 days, and the trial group used CPAP via mask therapy for half an hour every 2 hours plus CPT 4 hours. The inspiratory capacity (IC) in liters was used to compare the two groups of therapy and it was measured by incentive spirometer after the operation as baseline test, after 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours and post therapy. At the same time, RR, HR and SpO2 were measured for both groups. Failure was defined as a need for advanced therapy.

Results

Thirty-six patients participated in each group (57 male and 15 female). IC was increased significantly in the CPAP group (P = 0.005) and SpO2 was decreased significantly in the control group (P = 0.037). There were no significant differences in RR and HR. See Figure 1.

Figure 1
figure 1

Effect of adding CPT to CPAP via mask therapy to treat acute atelectasis.

Conclusion

Adding chest physiotherapy to CPAP via mask therapy had better outcomes to treat or prevent acute postoperative atelectasis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ALMutairi, F., Fallows, S., Abukhudair, W. et al. Difference between continuous positive airway pressure via mask therapy plus chest physiotherapy (CPT) and incentive spirometry therapy plus CPT to treat or prevent acute atelectasis after cardiac surgery. Crit Care 16 (Suppl 1), P135 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10742

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10742

Keywords