Skip to main content

Case-control study of failed extubation

Introduction

Failed extubation (FE), defined as reintubation within 48 hours of planned extubation (PE), is common. The literature suggests that FE complicates 10 to 20% of PE. The consequences of FE have not been well described, nor have its risk factors.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of prospectively collected data involving 2,012 consecutive patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV) in a 16-bed university-affiliated hospital between 1 October 2005 and 31 August 2011. Eighty-five patients with FE were matched 1:3 with successfully extubated patients (SE) using diagnostic category, age, Acute Physiology Score (APS) and duration of ventilation (DOV) before PE as matching criteria.

Results

Patients undergoing MV included 1,209 (60.1%) with SE; 224 (11.1%) died during ventilation (without prior FE); 206 (10.2%) were extubated to withdraw support; 180 (8.9%) were transferred from the ICU while ventilated; 81 (4.0%) were liberated from MV after tracheostomy; 85 (6.6%) failed PE. APS scores were higher (53 (42 to 69) vs. 43 (32 to 60), P < 0.0001) and DOV before PE longer (1.8 (0.8 to 4.4) vs. 0.9 (0.4 to 2.6), P = 0.0001) in FE than in SE. There was 100% concordance of diagnostic category and no statistically significant differences between the groups in regards to age, APS and DOV before PE. Table 1 illustrates the results of the case-control analysis. In addition, FE had more days in the hospital after ICU discharge than did SE: 11 (4 to 24) versus 5 (2 to 9), P < 0.0001.

Table 1 Case-control analysis of failed extubation: key outcomes

Conclusion

FE is associated with increased ICU and hospital LOS, increased risk of VAP and increased mortality. Efforts to prospectively identify patients at risk for FE may reduce its incidence and improve outcomes.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Krinsley.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krinsley, J., Reddy, P. & Iqbal, A. Case-control study of failed extubation. Crit Care 16, P128 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10735

Download citation

Keywords

  • Public Health
  • Retrospective Study
  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Diagnostic Category