Open Access

Plasma colloid osmotic pressure in healthy infants

Critical Care20015:261

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc1043

Received: 10 June 2001

Accepted: 25 June 2001

Published: 9 August 2001

Abstract

Background

The plasma colloid osmotic pressure (COP) plays a major role in transcapillary fluid balance. There is no information on plasma COP of healthy infants beyond the first post-natal week. The normal COP in healthy adult subjects (25 mmHg) is currently also applied as a reference value for healthy infants. This study was designed to test whether plasma COP values in healthy infants are the same as those in normal adults.

Methods

Plasma COP was measured in 37 male and female healthy infants from 1 to 11 months old. For this purpose, 1 ml blood was collected during the patient's regularly scheduled visit if the patient required any type of blood test for routine laboratory analyses.

Results

Plasma COP levels correlated slightly with increasing age from 1 to 9 months old (linear regression analysis; r2 = 0.1, P < 0.049). We found no correlation between plasma COP and body weight at the same age (r2 = 0.05, P = 0.155). The mean and standard deviation of COP in all infants was 25.1 ± 2.6 mmHg, which is almost identical to an average COP of 25 mmHg in healthy adult subjects. Arbitrary division of the infants into three different age groups (1–3 months [n = 11], 5–8 months [n = 13] and 9–11 months [n = 13]) showed an average increase of approximately 2 mmHg in COP of 9-month-old to 11-month-old infants, compared with 1-month-old to 3-month-old infants (one-way analysis of variance; P = 0.26). There was no gender difference in the COP level (unpaired t-test), with an average of 25.1 ± 2.4 mmHg in 19 male infants compared with 25.2 ± 2.9 in 18 female infants. The 95% confidence interval for COP in both male and female infants (n = 37) was between 24.3 to 26.0 mmHg, ranging from 19.5 to 30.3 mmHg, with a median value of 25.2 mmHg.

Conclusions

The data accept the null hypothesis that the COP range in infants younger than 1 year old is similar to those observed in adult subjects. Our observations, compared with previously reported neonatal COP values, suggest that there is a sharp increase in COP within the first months after birth.

Keywords

colloid osmotic pressurecolloid therapyfluid balanceinfant patientsneonate patients

Introduction

Plasma COP is generated by the plasma proteins, particularly albumin, and is known to vary during various neonatal diseases [1,2,3,4]. Lower plasma COP favors a fluid shift from intravascular space into interstitial space, with subsequent formation of peripheral and pulmonary edema [3,4,5,6,7,8]. To stabilize the intravascular volume and prevent or reverse the events leading to peripheral and pulmonary edema, albumin or other colloid solutions are frequently administered, to maintain the COP in the 'normal' range [7,8,9,10,11,12]. Albumin administration for various conditions, however, is controversial [13,14,15]. Plasma COP in healthy neonates, sick neonates, and prematurely born infants are reported to be much lower than in adults [16,17,18]. The normal range of COP for healthy adults is reported to be between 22 and 28 mmHg, with a mean of 25 mmHg [19,20]. There is, however, no information in the literature on normal COP range beyond the early neonatal age. The adult COP values in our intensive care unit are also considered to be normal for infants. The excessive use of albumin and its potential complications [15,21,22] may be avoided if the normal range of COP in infants is significantly less than in adults. The present study was therefore designed to determine the normal range of COP in infants younger than 1 year of age and to establish whether there is any correlation between post-natal age, gender, or weight and COP. The null hypothesis is that the COP range in the first months of life is in fact similar to those observed in adult subjects.

Patients and methods

The protocol for this study was approved by the Miami Children's Hospital Institutional Review Board and conducted in the Continuing Care Center of Miami Children's Hospital. The COP was determined in infants from birth to 12 months of age. Blood samples were taken during the patient's regularly scheduled clinic visit for 'well baby visits'. An additional 1 ml blood was collected for our research if the patient required any type of blood test for routine laboratory analyses. The COP was measured using the Model 4400 Colloid Osmometer (Wescor Inc., Logan, UT, USA) on serum that was separated from the sample after centrifugation.

The study was designed as a non-blinded, sequential, descriptive study. Patients were included in the study, after informed consent was obtained from the parent or guardian. Patients older than 1 year, those with an underlying illness, such as nephropathy, liver disease, cardiac anomalies, malnutrition, viral illness with resulting gastrointestinal disturbances or acute febrile illness, or history of any disease state that may interfere with protein metabolism were excluded.

Statistical analysis

A simple linear regression test was used to determine whether there is any correlation between age and COP, or body weight and COP. An unpaired t-test was used to evaluate gender differences in COP. We also used one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to evaluate whether the average COP levels were different among infants that were categorized into three different age groups of 1–3, 5–8, and 9–11 months old. All values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and P < 5% were considered significant.

Results

The study was concluded after completion of a single COP measurement in 19 male infants and 18 female infants from 1 to 11 months old. The study population consisted of 32 infants out of 37 infants with Hispanic origin. A relatively weak but significant correlation (r2 = 0.10, P < 0.049) was found between the COP values and age within the first year of life in healthy infants (Fig. 1). There was, however, no correlation between COP and body weight (Fig. 2). No gender differences were found between the male and female infants in this age group (Table 1). An arbitrary division of the all infants into three different age categories (1–3 months old [n = 11], 5–8 months old [n = 13] and 9–11 months old [n = 13]) showed an average increase of approximately 2 mmHg in COP in 9-month-old to 11-month-old infants, compared with 1-month-old to 3-month-old infants (one-way ANOVA). This increase from 24 to 25.8 mmHg was not statistically significant (one-way ANOVA; P = 0.26). The median value of COP for either male or female infants separately, or combined, was 25.1–25.2 mmHg, with a 95% confidence interval of 24.3–26.0 mmHg for the combined male and female infants (Table 1).
Figure 1

A weak association was found between colloid osmotic pressure (COP) levels and age in healthy infants within the first post-natal year (r2 = 0.10, n = 37, P < 0.049).

Figure 2

There is no significant correlation between colloid osmotic pressure (COP) levels and body weight in healthy infants within the first post-natal year (r2 = 0.05, n = 37, P = 0.15).

Table 1

Colloid osmotic pressure (COP) values in 1-month-old to 11-month-old healthy infants

 

Male and female

Males

Females

COP (mmHg)

(n = 37)

(n = 19)

(n = 18)

Mean ± SD

25.1 ± 2.6

25.1 ± 2.4

25.2 ± 2.9

Median

25.2

25.2

25.1

Range

19.5–30.3

20.9–29.8

19.5–30.3

95% Confidence interval

24.3–26.0

23.9–26.3

23.7–26.6

SD, standard deviation.

Discussion

Sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, hemorrhage and renal failure cause a decrease in the total plasma proteins with consequent reduction in COP, either because of the loss of blood proteins or owing to capillary leakage [4,5,6,7,8,9]. There are no standards for volume resuscitation and COP restoration of intensive care patients [22]. Because of the controversial debate on colloid versus crystalloid solutions for volume resuscitation [9,12,13,14,15,21,22], definition of the normal range of COP in different age groups is crucial. The present study was therefore designed to test whether the normal COP in adults does indeed represent the normal COP values in infants that are younger than 1 year old. The results of the study confirm that plasma COP in humans can reach its peak level as early as 1–3 months after birth. The results, therefore, justify the use of the adult COP range as a reference point for either colloid or crystalloid therapy for restoration of COP during various post-natal diseases that occur within the first year of life.

The plasma COP in the pre-term and full-term healthy neonates and in pre-term and full-term sick neonates [16,17,18] is much lower than those reported in adults [19,20]. For example, the average COP ± SD in five healthy pre-term neonates was reported to be 15.4 ± 1.3 mmHg [16], compared with an average of 25 mmHg in adults [19,20]. The COP in 40 sick pre-term neonates was also significantly lower (12.4 ± 1.6 mmHg) compared with healthy pre-term neonates [16]. Solo and Gregory [17] have also reported a similar range of COP (12.5 ± 2.5 mmHg) in 362 sick pre-term infants. Healthy full-term neonates (n = 99), delivered vaginally, had a higher COP of 19.4 ± 2.2 mmHg, compared with 40 healthy full-term neonates who were delivered by Cesarean section [17]. Zimmermann et al [18] found a strong relationship between water homeostasis and neonatal respiratory distress. They showed a significantly lower COP of 15 ± 2.2 mmHg in 1-day-old neonates with respiratory distress, compared with 17.9 ± 2.5 mmHg in healthy neonates [18].

The lack of a significant gender difference in COP of our healthy infants allowed us to combine the COP of the male and female subjects in a larger group. The demographic cross-section of the population used in this study was mostly of Hispanic origin (32 of 37 infants). Although the Hispanic population in South Florida is not ethnically a homogeneous group, the question is whether our sample can truly represent infants from other ethnic groups. Our infant's population included only one 9-month-old black female with a COP of 23.4 mmHg. This value falls slightly below the 95% confidence interval, calculated for the entire female infants of our sample (Table 1). This COP level, however, was within the observed range, and was only one unit of SD away from the sample mean (equivalent to the 33rd percentile). The mean ± SD of four non-Hispanic white infants (three females and one male) in our sample was 25.5 ± 3.7 mmHg, compared with an average of 25.1 ± 2.5 mmHg in 32 Hispanic infants. This small sample suggests that the observed COP values in the larger Hispanic group are indeed representative of COP levels in healthy infants of non-Hispanic children. In conclusion, our data extend the age spectrum for the normal COP levels to also include the first post-natal year. Our results compared with those observed during the early neonatal period in healthy full-term and pre-term infants [15,16,17,18] suggest a sharp increase in COP within the first months after birth.

Abbreviations

ANOVA: 

ANOVA = analysis of variance

COP: 

COP = colloid osmotic pressure

SD: 

SD = standard deviation.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The technical assistance of Miss Danielle Katz is gratefully acknowledged.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Miami Children's Hospital

References

  1. Wiederhielm CA: Dynamics of transcapillary fluid exchange. J Gen Physiol 1968, 52: 29-61.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Carlson RW, Haupt MT: Colloid-hydrostatic gradients and pulmonary edema. Chest 1982, 82: 398-399.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Vincent JL: Fluids for resuscitation. Br J Anaesth 1991, 67: 185-193.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Weil MH, Henning RJ, Puri VK: Colloid oncotic pressure: clinical significance. Crit Care Med 1997, 7: 113-116.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Guyton AC, Lindsey AW: Effect of left atrial and decreased plasma protein on the development of pulmonary edema. Circ Res 1959, 7: 649.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Rackow EC, Fein IA, Leppo J: Colloid osmotic pressure as a prognostic indicator of pulmonary edema and mortality in the critically ill. Chest 1997, 72: 709-713.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Haupt MT, Kaufman BS, Carlson RW: Fluid resuscitation in patients with increased vascular permeability. Crit Care Clin 1992, 8: 341-353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Joles JA, Rabelink TJ, Braam B, Koomans HA: Plasma volume regulation: Defences against edema formation (with special emphasis on hypoproteinemia). Am J Nephrol 1993, 13: 399-412.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Waiker SS, Chertow GM: Crystalloids versus colloids for resuscitation in shock. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2000, 9: 501-504. 10.1097/00041552-200009000-00007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaminski MV Jr, Haase TJ: Albumin and colloid osmotic pressure: implications for fluid resuscitation. Crit Care Clin 1992, 8: 311-321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Roberts JS, Bratton SL: Colloid volume expanders. Problems, pitfalls and possibilities. Drugs 1998, 55: 621-630.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Vincent JL: Strategies in body fluid replacement. Minerva Anesthesiol 2000, 66: 278-284.Google Scholar
  13. Camacho MT, Totapally BR, Torbati D, Wolfsdorf J: Pulmonary and extrapulmonary effects of increased colloid osmotic pressure during endotoxemia in rats. Chest, in press.Google Scholar
  14. Allison SP, Lobo DN: Debate: Albumin administration should not be avoided. Crit Care 2000, 4: 147-150. 10.1186/cc687PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pulimood TB, Park GR: Debate: Albumin administration should be avoided in the critically ill. Crit Care 2000, 4: 151-155. 10.1186/cc688PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bhat R, Javed S, Malalis L, Vidyasagar D: Critical care problems in neonates: colloid osmotic pressure in healthy and sick neonates. Crit Care Med 1981, 9: 563-567.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Solo A, Gregory GA: Colloid osmotic pressure of normal newborns and premature infants. Crit Care Med 1981, 9: 568-572.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Zimmermann B, Francoise M, Germain JF, Lallemant C, Gouyon JB: Colloid osmotic pressure in neonateal respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Petiatr (Paris) 1997, 4: 952-958. 10.1016/S0929-693X(97)86090-3Google Scholar
  19. Weil MH, Morissette M, Michaels S: Routine plasma colloid osmotic pressure measurements. Crit Care Med 1974, 2: 229-234.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Morissette MP: Colloid osmotic pressure: its measurement and critical value. CMAJ 1977, 116: 897-900.Google Scholar
  21. Schierhout G, Roberts I: Fluid resuscitation with colloid or crystalloid solutions in critically ill patients. a systematic review of randomized trials. BMJ 1998, 316: 961-964.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Boldt J, Lenz M, Kumle B, Papsdorf M: Volume replacement strategies of intensive care units: results from a postal survey. Intensive Care Med 1998, 24: 147-151. 10.1007/s001340050536View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2001