Skip to main content

Pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and dynamic arterial elastance

We read with interest the recent article by Monge Garcia and colleagues [1]. We have two comments regarding this interesting physiological study.

First, although we support their observation [2], their explanations may lead to some confusion. Indeed, the Edwards Vigileo™ system-FloTrac™ sensor calculates stroke volume (SV) using the equation:

where σAP is the standard deviation of the arterial pressure (AP) curve and Khi a constant quantifying arterial elastance and vascular resistance [3]. As stroke volume variation (SVV):

Which means that SVV (%) ≈ pulse pressure variation (PPV; %) for FloTrac™.

With the present mathematical equation, it can be demonstrated that the SVV calculated by FloTrac™ (SVVFT) is not influenced by Khi, which means that SVVFT calculation does not include effective arterial elastance (Ea). The originality of Garcia and colleagues' finding is that they realized that when measuring PPV conventionally [4], the ratio PPV/SVVFT becomes a mirror of a dynamic Ea, as the conventional PPV selected integrates Khi (Figure 1). However, when the present innovative method is used, PPV and SVV should be sampled during the same period of time.

Figure 1
figure1

Model of two different arterial elastances (Ea and Ea) on the pulse pressure variation (PVV) relationship curve, with the same stroke volume variation (SVV) value.

In conclusion, we believe that dynamic Ea predicting arterial pressure response to volume loading in preload-dependent patients is an interesting physiological concept. However, this demonstration cannot be achieved without taking into consideration the impact of PPV/SVV sampling.

Abbreviations

AP:

arterial pressure

Ea:

arterial elastance

PP:

pulse pressure

PPV:

pulse pressure variation

SV:

stroke volume

SVV:

stroke volume variation.

References

  1. 1.

    Monge Garcia MI, Gil Cano A, Gracia Romero M: Dynamic arterial elastance to predict arterial pressure response to volume loading in preload-dependent patients. Crit Care 2011, 15: R15. 10.1186/cc9420

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bendjelid K: When to recalibrate the PiCCO? From a physiological point of view, the answer is simple. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009, 53: 689-690. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.01919.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Manecke GR: Edwards FloTrac sensor and Vigileo monitor: easy, accurate, reliable cardiac output assessment using the arterial pulse wave. Expert Rev Med Devices 2005, 2: 523-527. 10.1586/17434440.2.5.523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Michard F, Chemla D, Richard C, Wysocki M, Pinsky MR, Lecarpentier Y, Teboul JL: Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999, 159: 935-939.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karim Bendjelid.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giraud, R., Siegenthaler, N. & Bendjelid, K. Pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and dynamic arterial elastance. Crit Care 15, 414 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10088

Download citation

Keywords

  • Standard Deviation
  • Arterial Pressure
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Stroke Volume
  • Vascular Resistance