Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Letter
  • Open Access

Cytomegalovirus infection monitored by quantitative real-time PCR in critically ill patients

  • 1, 2Email author,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 2
Critical Care201115:412

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10066

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Ganciclovir
  • Herpes Virus
  • Cytomegalovirus Infection
  • Hemophagocytic Syndrome
  • Herpes Virus Infection
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation has been widely documented in the past 10 years in critically ill patients [1]. Conversely, few data are available on burn patients despite experimental studies showing that these patients are predisposed to herpes virus infections [2]. To our knowledge, only two studies reported the incidence of CMV infection in burn patients using a modern technique, such as PCR, which has become the gold standard [3, 4]. These two studies demonstrated a high rate of CMV reactivation, 55% and 71%, respectively. Moreover, CMV reactivation in burn patients has been proven to be intense. Indeed, in the study of Bordes and colleagues [4], 67% of patients who reactivated CMV experienced viremia greater than 1,000 copies/ml, and 33% viremia greater than 10,000 copies/ml. These results may reflect the severe immunosuppression that characterizes thermally injured patients. Consequently, severe burn patients could be considered as a model for CMV reactivation in critically ill patients. However, the precise kinetics of CMV DNA load in these patients is still poorly documented. That is why we would like to briefly present data from longitudinal monitoring of CMV infection by real-time PCR (RT-PCR) in four severe burn patients during their ICU stay (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Cytomegalovirus plasma load measurements during ICU stay of four severe burn patients.

All the patients were CMV IgG seropositive on admission. They were monitored for CMV reactivation once to twice a week. Detection of CMV DNA in blood samples was performed by quantitative RT-PCR on whole blood. The patients' characteristics are described in Table 1. Patient 2 presented a CMV-associated hemophagocytic syndrome and was treated by ganciclovir for a duration of 21 days. DNAemia became undetectable in patients 3 and 4 spontaneously. These examples demonstrate that critically ill patients may experience several episodes of CMV reactivation during their ICU stay, and that CMV viral load can be very changeable. Furthermore, CMV viremia may be highly variable over a short period.
Table 1

Patient characteristics

Patient

Age (years)

TBSA (%)

DBSA (%)

IGS 2 score

ICU stay (days)

Viremia peaka

Outcome

1

80

15

0

41

30

9,130

Discharged from ICU

2

76

40

40

38

141

63,400

Died in ICU

3

82

15

15

54

133

130,000

Discharged from ICU

4

60

28

20

29

105

137,000

Died in ICU

aViremia peak is expressed in copies/ml. DBSA, deep burn surface area; TBSA, total burn surface area.

In our opinion, CMV reactivation in critically ill patients should be monitored with quantitative methods of detection, such as RT-PCR. Indeed, we hypothesize that the potential role of CMV on patient outcome is mostly due to the intensity of CMV reactivation rather than the CMV reactivation per se. That is why we suggest that studies aimed at determining the role of CMV reactivation as a contributor to outcome in critically ill patients should use quantitative methods of detection. Consequently, a CMV viremia threshold could be determined to guide preemptive therapy in these patients.

Written consent for publication was obtained from the patients or patients' relatives.

Abbreviations

CMV: 

cytomegalovirus

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

RT-PCR: 

real-time PCR.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Teaching Military Sainte Anne Hospita, BP20545, Toulon, Cedex, 83041, France
(2)
Burn Center, Sainte Anne Hospital, BP20545, Toulon, Cedex, 83041, France
(3)
Laboratory of Biology, Sainte Anne Hospital, BP20545, Toulon, Cedex, 83041, France

References

  1. Osawa R, Singh N: Cytomegalovirus infection in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care 2009, 13: R68. 10.1186/cc7875PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kobayashi M, Herndon DN, Pollard RB, Suzuki F: CD4+ contrasuppressor T cells improve the resistance of thermally injured mice infected with HSV. J Leukoc Biol 1995, 58: 159-167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Limaye AP, Kirby KA, Rubenfeld GD, Leisenring WM, Bulger EM, Neff MJ, Gibran NS, Huang ML, Santo Hayes TK, Corey L, Boeckh M: Cytomegalovirus reactivation in critically ill immunocompetent patients. JAMA 2008, 300: 413-422. 10.1001/jama.300.4.413PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bordes J, Maslin J, Prunet B, d'Aranda E, Lacroix G, Goutorbe P, Dantzer E, Meaudre E: Cytomegalovirus infection in severe burn patients monitoring by real-time polymerase chain reaction: A prospective study. Burns 2011, in press.Google Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement