Table 3 Funding challenges, perspectives, solutions and examples
From: Trauma systems in high socioeconomic index countries in 2050
| Â | Funding | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Challenge | Perspective solution | Example | |
Compensate resource intensity trauma | Compensate for trauma care capacity and readiness | Trauma Readiness Fee | |
Dependency on central funding by lead agency | Insufficient budget or resource autonomy at center and network level from central funding and lead agency | Develop alternative funding sources | USA: fees from fine, fees vehicle registration and insurance [90] Charity, lottery (UK HEMS) |
Technology development and knowledge transfer | Technology pipeline not matched to clinical needs Insufficient compensation of knowledge transfer from healthcare providers to industry | Public–Private partnership, joint labs Channel percentage of industry revenues to healthcare organizations | Technology transfer desk, conceive partnership from start of scientific pipeline Incorporate revenue models and provide legal framework, account for corporate responsibility (automobile, sport,…) |
Inadequate staffing and material resources | Inflexible staff recruitment and incentive mechanism Inflexible and long public provision process for material | Decentralize recruitment and incentive mechanism Simplify pipeline for provision | Competitive recruitment of health professionals and experts (psychologist, data and computer science, network specialists) |