Skip to main content

Table 1 Examples of currently active multicentre research registries enrolling patients with cardiogenic shock

From: Cardiogenic shock: all hail the RCT, long live the registry

Name

Location

Start date

Centre n

Inclusions

Disease-based registries

Cardiac Critical Care Trials Network (CCCTN)

US, Canada, UK

2019

42

All CS aetiologies, high volume CICUs

VANQUISH

US, Canada

2022

4

All CS aetiologies, high-volume CICUs

ICNARC Cardiogenic Shock Registry**

UK

2023

6**

All CS aetiologies, all hospital types

Altshock-2 registry (https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30484)

Italy

2020

11

All CS aetiologies, advanced MCS centres

Cardiac Shock Working Group (CSWG)

US

2016

15

All CS aetiologies, high-volume CICUs

AHA Cardiogenic Shock Registry

US

2022

54

All CS aetiologies, all hospital types

Device-based registries

Extracorporeal Life Support Organisation (ELSO)

International

1990

634§

Patients receiving “cardiac” ECMO

Japan Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Registry (J-PVAD)

Japan

2017

109

Patients receiving Impella ®

National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative (NCSI)

US

2016

80

Patients with AMI-related CS receiving Impella®

  1. CICU cardiac intensive care unit; VANQUISH The Multicenter Collaborative to Enhance Biological Under- standing, Quality and Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock VANQUISH Shock; ICNARC Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre; AHA American Heart Association; MCS Mechanical Circulatory support
  2. **Personal correspondence, In pilot phase. Anticipated centre size of 150–200
  3. §As per the “adult cardiac” subgroup from ELSO report 2023