Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics

From: Efficacy of CytoSorb®: a systematic review and meta-analysis

First author

Year

Study design

Patient characteristics

Treatment scheme

N (CytoSorb®/Control)

Age (CytoSorb®/Control) M or Md

Sex (% male) (CytoSorb®/Control)

Schädler

2017

RCT, open-label, multi-centre

Severe sepsis or septic shock and ARDS

6 h per day for up to 7 consecutive days

47/50

66/65

74/70

Hawchar

2019

RCT, open-label, single-centre

Early (< 24 h) onset of septic shock, mechanical ventilation, norepinephrine > 10 μg/min

1 treatment for 24 h

10/10

60/71

70/60

Brouwer

2019

Retrospective PS weighted register study, single-centre

Septic shock with CRRT treated on ICU

Treatment until improvement

67/49

61/69

55/61

Akil

2020

Retrospective control group, prospective intervention group, single-centre

Pneumogenic sepsis and ECMO therapy

 ≥ 2 treatments; device changed every 24 h

13/7

61/61

38/29

Schittek

2020

Retrospective control group, prospective intervention group, single-centre

Septic shock with acute kidney injury and noradrenaline dose (> 20 µg/min)

 ≥ 1 treatment

43/33

63/62

88/72

Rugg

2020

Retrospective PS matched study, single-centre

Septic shock patients with RRT

 ≥ 1 treatment

42/42

64/68

64/60

Kogelmann

2021

Retrospective register study, multi-centre

Septic shock patients treated on ICU

 ≥ 1 treatment

198/69

62/66

61/NA

Garcia

2021

Retrospective control group, prospective intervention group, PS matched study, single-centre

severe, refractory septic shock

3 treatments for 24 h

48/48

57/58

65/65

Bernardi

2016

RCT, blinded, single-centre

Elective CPB surgery

Treatment during CPB

19/18

64/69

63/78

Träger

2017

Retrospective register study, single-centre

CPB surgery due to acute infective endocarditis

Treatment during CPB

39/28

61/72

69/71

Nemeth

2018

Prospective PS matched study, open-label, single-centre

Orthotopic heart transplantations without early postoperative death (72 h)

Treatment during CPB

16/16

51/50

88/78

Poli

2019

RCT, double-blinded, single-centre

Elective cardiac surgery with expected long CPB duration (> 120 min)

Treatment during CPB

15/15

67/69

88/73

Gleason

2019

RCT, open-label, multi-centre

Complex cardiac surgery with expected CPB duration > 3 h

2 parallel devices during CPB

23/23

66/61

56/78

Hassan

2019

Retrospective register study, single-centre

Emergency cardiac surgery under ticagrelor or rivaroxaban

Treatment during CPB

39/16

NA/ NA

66/81

Saller

2019

Retrospective PS matched study, single-centre

Aortic surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest

Treatment during CPB

168/168

64/63

67/67

Wagner

2019

RCT, blinded, single-centre

Ross or David surgery

Treatment during CPB

13/10

50/54

87/100

Stupica

2020

RCT, double-blinded, single-centre

Elective high risk cardiac surgery with CPB duration > 90 min

Treatment during CPB

20/20

71/71

70/70

Haidari

2020

Retrospective register study, single-centre

Surgery of native mitral valve endocarditis

Treatment during CPB

30/28

59/61

70/57

Santer

2021

Retrospective PS weighted register study, single-centre

Valve surgery due to endocarditis

Treatment during CPB

41/200

66/65

92/78

Zhigalov

2021

Retrospective PS matched study, single-centre

LVAD implantation

Treatment during CPB

72/40

56/58

85/77

Asch

2021

RCT, open-label, single-centre

Cardiac surgery due to infective endocarditis

Treatment during CPB and 3 afterwards for 8 h each

10/10

65/69

70/90

Hassan

2022

Retrospective register study, single-centre

Emergency surgery for acute type A dissection under rivaroxaban or ticagrelor

treatment during CPB

10/11

75/62

40/55

Diab

2022

RCT, open-label, multi-centre

Surgery due to infective endocarditis

Treatment during CPB

138/144

69/69

71/77

Wilhelmi

2018

Retrospective register study, single-centre

Polytrauma

 ≥ 1 treatment for up to 4 days

5/5

35/32

100/100

Rieder

2021

Retrospective PS matched study, single-centre

ARDS treated with V-V ECMO and PCT > 3 ng/ml, IL-6 > 600 pg/ml

 ≥ 3 treatments

9/9

43/44

78/67

Scharf

2021

Retrospective PS matched study, single-centre

Serve illness (IL-6 > 10,000 pg/ml)

Treatment for at least 90 min

19/19

56/61

74/56

Rasch

2022

Retrospective control group, prospective intervention group, PS matched study, multi-centre

Acute pancreatitis, APACHE-II score of ≥ 10 and ≥ 1 marker of poor prognosis

2 treatments for 24 h each

16/32

52/60

75/66

Rampino

2020

Retrospective register study, single-centre

COVID-19, PaO2/FiO2 < 200 mmHg, CRP > 10 mg/dL, lymphocyte < 1500/mmc

2 treatments for 4 h each on 2 consecutive days

5/4

58/66

100/75

Schroeder

2020

Retrospective register study, single-centre

COVID-19 on ICU

 ≥ 1 treatment

13/57

NA/NA

NA/NA

Supady

2021

RCT, open-label, single-centre

COVID-19 pneumonia requiring ECMO

3 treatments for 24 h each

17/17

62/59

71/76

Stockmann

2022

RCT, open-label, single-centre

COVID-19 with vasoplegic shock (norepinephrine > 0.2 μg/kg/min, CRP 100 mg/L, and RRT)

 ≥ 3 treatments for 24 h each

23/26

61/66

91/77

Akin

2020

Prospective PS matched study, single-centre

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with increased vasopressor need

 ≥ 1 treatment for up to 3 days

24/48

62/61

83/83

Supady

2022 (a)

Retrospective PS matched study, single-centre

After cardiac arrest on ECMO

3 treatments for 24 h each

23/23

53/53

78/74

Supady

2022 (b)

RCT, open-label, single-centre

After cardiac arrest on ECMO

3 treatments for 24 h each

22/19

61/64

68/63