Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of area under the curve for identification of the presence of microcirculatory alterations associated with COVID-19 status between the algorithm-based, deep learning-based and combined models in internal and external validation

From: Microcirculatory alterations in critically ill COVID-19 patients analyzed using artificial intelligence

Model type

AUROC (CI) for identification of COVID-19 status

Linear regression estimates as mean difference ± S.E. (CI)

T statistic and P value

Internal validation cohort

External validation cohort

Between-model comparison

Between-cohort comparison

Between-model comparison

Between-cohort comparison

Algorithm-based model

0.74 (0.69–0.79)

0.73 (0.71–0.76)

–

 − 0.10 ± 0 .00 (− 0.10 to − 0.10)

–

 − 61.88, < 0.0001

Deep learning-based model

0.81 (0.76–0.86)

0.61 (0.58–0.63)

 − 0.03 ± 0.00 (− 0.03 to − 0.03)

 − 15.04, < 0.0001

Combined model

0.84 (0.80–0.89)

0.75 (0.73–0.78)

0.06 ± 0.00 (0.06–0.06)

30.20, < 0.0001

  1. AUROC bootstrap area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, CI 95% confidence interval, S.E. standard error