Skip to main content

Table 2 Feasibility and results (overall and for individual coronary artery territories) for segmental wall assessment with convention and advanced echocardiography as well as myocardial contrast perfusion echocardiography

From: Feasibility of myocardial perfusion assessment with contrast echocardiography: can it improve recognition of significant coronary artery disease in the ICU?

Parameter

Feasibility

Patients n (%)

Feasibility

n/total segments (%)

Value

No coronary artery disease

Significant coronary artery disease

p value

2D segmental thickening assessment (wall motion score index)

LAD

36 (90%)

329/360 (91%)

2 (1.5–2.5)

2 (1.4–2.6)

1.9 (1.5–2.6)

0.75

LCx

34 (85%)

142/160 (89%)

2 (1–2)

2 (1–2)

2 (1–2.5)

0.75

RCA

40 (100%)

233/240 (97%)

2 (1–2)

2 (1–2)

2 (1–2.1)

0.98

Longitudinal strain analysis by speckle tracking echocardiography (%)

LAD

25 (63%)

263/360 (73%)

− 6.25% (− 10 to – 2)

− 5.4% (− 10 to − 1)

− 7% (− 18 to − 5)

0.29

LCx

34 (85%)

137/160 (86%)

− 8.1% (6)

− 7.9% (6)

− 9.3 (5)

0.59

RCA

36 (90%)

210/240 (88%)

− 9.2% (5)

−9% (− 11 to − 6)

− 7.5% (− 16 to − 7)

0.9

Myocardial contrast perfusion echocardiography

Subjective assessment (n)

Overall

400/640 (62.5%)

4

1

3

0.01

LAD

21 (53%)

260/360 (72%)

4

1

3

0.01

LCx

8 (20%)

58/160 (36%)

2

0

2

0.02

RCA

21 (53%)

142/240 (59%)

2

0

2

0.02

Quantitative assessment (dB/s)

Overall

423/640 (66%)

3.2 (3–4)

3.3 (3–4)

2.6 (1–3)

0.03

LAD

26 (65%)

268/360 (74%)

3.3 (3–4)

3.3 (3–4)

2.5 (1.4–3)

0.04

LCx

13 (33%)

72/160 (45%)

2.9 (1)

3.1 (3–4)

1.6 (1–3)

0.02

RCA

23 (58%)

154/240 (64%)

3.0 (1)

3.1 (1)

2.5 (1)

0.28

  1. LAD left anterior descending coronary artery, LCx left circumflex coronary artery, RCA right coronary artery
  2. The italicized data was simply meant to highlight the values which are statistically significant (ie: have p values <0.05)