Study | Scoring system | Discrimination | Calibration | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nouira et al. (1998) [66] | MPM (24 hours) | 0.88 | C statistic χ2 = 29.59 (p < 0.001) | NR | NR | NR |
H statistic χ2 = 19.9 (p < 0.05) | ||||||
Nouira et al. (1998) [66] | MPM (initial) | 0.85 | C statistic χ2 = 36.66 (p < 0.001) | NR | NR | NR |
H statistic χ2 = 38 (p < 0.05) | ||||||
Sekulic et al. (2015) [48] | MPM II (7 days) | 1.00 | χ2 = 0.00 (p =1.000) | 100% | Presented as figure | NR |
Juneja et al. (2012) [1] | MPM II (initial) | 0.928 (0.904–0.952) | χ2 = 8.627 (p = 0.375) | 95.1% (DC > 27) | 68.2% (DC > 27) | NR |
Sutheechet (2009) [79] | MPM II (24 hours) | 0.91 (0.88–0.93) | C statistic χ2 = 14.45 (p = 0.07) | Individual values for each risk level | Individual values for each risk level | Individual values for each risk level |
Soares et al. (2004) [40] | MPM II (24 hours) | 0.909 (0.891–0.926) | H statistic χ2 = 114.713 (p < 0.001) | NR | NR | NR |
Soares et al. (2004) [40] | MPM II (initial) | 0.854 (0.83–0.878) | H statistic χ2 = 373.317 (p < 0.001) | NR | NR | NR |
Sekulic et al. (2015) [48] | MPM II (48 hours) | 0.836 | χ2 = 11.37 (p = 0.181) | Presented as figure | Presented as figure | NR |
Sekulic et al.(2015) [48] | MPM II (72 hours) | 0.817 | χ2 = 6.04 (p = 0.534) | Presented as figure | Presented as figure | NR |
Hamza et al. (2009) [76] | MPM II (initial) | 0.81 (0.738–0.882) | H statistic χ2 = 8.825 (p = 0.357) | NR | NR | NR |
Aggarwal et al. (2006) [7] | MPM II (24 hours) | 0.733 | C statistics χ2 = 73.1 (p < 0.001) H statistics χ2 = 69.7 (p < 0.001) | 48.1% (39.9–56.2) (DC = 25%), 24.0% (17.5–31.6) (DC = 50%), 14.35 (9.2–20.8) (DC = 75%) | 0.836 (0.789–0.876) (DC = 25%), 0.956 (0.927–0.977) (DC = 50%), 0.990 (0.971–0.998) (DC = 75%) | 0.715 (0.671–0.756) (DC = 25%), 0.712 (0.668–0.754) (DC = 50%), 0.701 (0.657–0.743) (DC = 75%) |
Aggarwal et al. (2006) [7] | MPM II (initial) | 0.665 | C statistics χ2 = 599.2 (p < 0.001) H statistics χ2 = 456.4 (p < 0.001) | 27.9% (0.210–0.355) (DC = 25%), 11.4% (0.069–0.174) (DC = 50%), 2.5% (0.007–0.064) (DC = 75%) | 0.920 (0.884–0.948) (DC = 25%), 0.980 (0.957–0.993) (DC = 50%), 0.993 (0.976–0.999) (DC = 75%) | 0.699 (0.655–0.741) (DC = 25%), 0.682 (0.637–0.724) (DC = 50%), 0.660 (0.615–0.703) (DC = 75%) |
Sekulic et al. (2015) [48] | MPM II (initial) | 0.654 | χ2 = 6.90 (p = 0.548) | 85.20% | Presented as figure | NR |
Sekulic et al. (2015) [48] | MPM II (24 hours) | Presented as figure | χ2 = 16.23 (p = 0.039) | Presented as figure | Presented as figure | NR |
Juneja et al. (2012) [1] | MPM III (initial) | 0.947 (0.927–0.967) | χ2 = 13.835 (p = 0.086) | 94.2% (DC >19) | 80.2% (DC > 19) | NR |
Nassar et al. (2012) [42] | MPM III (initial) | 0.84 (0.83–0.849) | C statistic χ2 = 134.2 (p < 0.01) | NR | NR | NR |
Riviello et al. (2016) [43] | MPM III (initial) | 0.72 | χ2 = 17.66 (0.024) | NR | NR | NR |
Soares et al. (2010) [41] | MPM III (24 hours) | 0.71 (0.67–0.75) | C statistic χ2 = 14.242 (p = 0.076) | NR | NR | NR |