Table 5 Model performance for all versions of APACHE
Study | Scoring system | Discrimination | Calibration | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Khwannimit and Bhurayanontachai (2011) [51] | APACHE II (recalibrated model) | 0.936 (0.925–0.947) | C statistic χ2 = 16.1 (p = 0.09) | NR | NR | NR |
H statistic χ2 = 14.1(p < 0.17) | ||||||
Khwannimit and Bhurayanontachai (2011) [51] | APACHE II | 0.936 (0.925–0.947) | C statistic χ2 = 104.2(p < 0.001) | NR | NR | NR |
H statistic χ2 = 113.1(p < 0.001) | ||||||
Khan et al. (2015) [32] | APACHE II (48 hours) | 0.933 (0.873–0.992) | NR | 94.1% (DC > 9.5) | 86.3% (DC > 9.5) | NR |
Godinjak et al. (2016) [31] | APACHE II | 0.920 (0.87–0.97) | NR | 74.5% (DC = 27.5) | 93.4% (DC = 27.5) | NR |
Khawannimit and Geater (2007) [38] | APACHE II | 0.911 (0.891–0.93) | C statistic χ2 = 66.65 (p < 0.001) | 73.87% (95% CI = 65.23–75.66) | 92% (95% CI = 89.66–93.20) | 87% (95% CI = 85.47–89.13) |
H statistic χ2 = 66.59 (p < 0.001) | ||||||
Fadaizadeh et al. (2012) [67] | APACHE II | 0.897 (0.858–0.937) | C statistic χ2 = 3:27 (p = 0:916) | 90% (DC = 13.5) | 75% (DC 13.5) | NR |
Juneja et al. (2012) [1] | APACHE II | 0.894 (0.864–0.925) | χ2 = 7.959 (p = 0.438) | 74.8% (DC >20.5) | 84.9% (DC >20.5) | NR |
Soares et al. (2004) [40] | APACHE II | 0.888 (0.868–0.907) | H statistic χ2 = 78.181 (p < 0.001) | NR | NR | NR |
Xing et al. (2015) [52] | APACHE II | 0.863 (0.804–0.923) | χ2 = 3.486 (p = 0.900) | NR | NR | NR |
Sathe and Bapat (2014) [69] | APACHE II | 0.86 | χ2 = 12.8 (p = 0.03) | NR | NR | NR |
Hosseini and Ramazani (2015) [80] | APACHE II | 0.857 (0.788–0.925) | χ2 = 10.203 (p = 0.251) | 96.6% | 62.80% | 79.70% |
Naqvi et al. (2016) [33] | APACHE II | 0.835 | χ2 = 3.199 (p = 0.866) | NR | NR | NR |
Gilani et al. (2014) [70] | APACHE II | 0.828 | χ2 = 5.419 (p = 0.712) | 88.2% (DC = 19) | 65.5% (DC = 19) | 27.9% |
Hashmi et al. (2016) [77] | APACHE II (automatic calculation using software) | 0.827 (0.77–0.88) | χ2 = 5.46 (p = 0.71) | 55.71% | 90.21% | 78.87% |
Hashmi et al. (2016) [77] | APACHE II | 0.823 (0.76–0.88) | χ2 = 11.76 (p = 0.16) | 51.42% | 90.91% | 77.9% |
Chang et al. (2006) [64] | APACHE II | 0.82 | χ2 = 9.8 (p =0.28) | NR | NR | NR |
Nouira et al. (1998) [66] | APACHE II | 0.82 | C statistic χ2 = 25.95 (p < 0.001) | NR | NR | NR |
H statistic χ2 = 32.15 (p < 0.05) | ||||||
Liu et al. (2016) [61] | APACHE II | 0.813 ± 0.055 | NR | 89.6% (DC ≥ 15.0) | 74.8% (DC ≥ 15.0) | NR |
Ratanarat et al. (2005) [68] | APACHE II | 0.788 | NR | 80.9% (DC = 20) | 63.2% (DC = 20) | NR |
Khan et al. (2015) [32] | APACHE II | 0.785 (0.69–0.88) | NR | 94.4% (DC > 9.5) | 49% (DC > 9.5) | NR |
Nimgaonkar et al. (2004) [35] | APACHE II | 0.77 | H statistic χ2 = 123.5 (p < 0.05) | NR | NR | NR |
Faruq et al. (2013) [37] | APACHE II | 0.75 (0.67–0.82) | C statistic χ2 = 8.304 (p = 0.40) | NR | NR | NR |
Ahluwalia et al. (1999) [29] | APACHE II | 0.74 | NR | 93% | 23.6% | NR |
Chiavone and Rasslan (2005) [65] | APACHE II | 0.729 (0.63–0.83) | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Wilairatana et al. (1995) [82] | APACHE II | 0.723 | NR | 77.4% (DC = 19) | 61.1% (DC = 19) | 70.8% |
Aggarwal et al. (2006) [7] | APACHE II | 0.713 | C statistic χ2 = 119.3 (p < 0.001) H statistic χ2 = 81.1 (p < 0.001) | 48% (39.9–56.2) (DC = 25%), 20.1% (14.1–27.3) (DC = 50%), 3.2% (1.1–7.4) (DC = 75%) | 84% (79.6–88.2) (DC 25%), 96% (92.7–97.7) (DC 50%), 97.7% (98.1–100) (DC 75%) | 71.9% (67.5–76) (DC 25%), 69.9% (65.1–74.3) (DC 50%), 66.8 (62.3–71.1) (DC 75%) |
Halim et al. (2009) [75] | APACHE II | 0.694 | χ2 = 10.627 (p = 0.014) | 83% | 55.2% | 66% |
Gupta and Arora (2004) [72] | APACHE II | 0.63 | χ2 = 10.34 (p > 0.05) | NR | NR | 89.7% (DC 70%) |
Sekulic et al. (2015) [48] | APACHE II | 0.623 | χ2 = 3.05 (p =0.931) | Presented as a figure | 81.80% | NR |
Eapen et al. (1997) [30] | APACHE II (VA) | 0.6068 | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Galal et al. (2013) [49] | APACHE II | 0.6 | χ2 = 7.34, p = 0.39 | 93% (DC = 11) | 24% (DC = 11) | 55.2% |
Evran et al. (2016) [47] | APACHE II | Presented as a figure | NR | NR | NR | 81.3% |
Kiatboonsri and Charoenpan (1995) [45] | APACHE II | NR | NR | 60% (DC = 50%) | 95% (DC = 50%) | 83% (DC = 50%) |
Juneja et al. (2012) [1] | APACHE III | 0.922 (0.894–0.949) | χ2 = 3.674 (p = 0.885) | 78.6% (DC > 73) | 86% (DC > 73) | NR |
Soares et al. (2004) [40] | APACHE III | 0.915 (0.898–0.933) | H statistic χ2 = 117.206 (p < 0.001) | NR | NR | NR |
Shrestha et al. (2011) [73] | APACHE III | 0.895 (0.839–0.952) | χ 2 = 16.904 (p = 0.031) | 91% | 73.97% | 80.34% |
Gilani et al. (2014) [70] | APACHE III | 0.78 | χ2 = 8.442 (p = 0.392) | 82.3% (DC = 24) | 58% (DC = 24) | NR |
Wilairatana et al. (1995) [82] | APACHE III | 0.694 | NR | 79.8% (DC = 60) | 66% (DC = 60) | 72.4% |
Juneja et al. (2012) [1] | APACHE IV | 0.928 (0.903–0.953) | χ2 = 8.790 (p = 0.360) | 93.2% (cut-off point > 12.5) | 66.9% (cut-off point > 12.5) | NR |
Nassar et al. (2012) [42] | APACHE IV | 0.883 (0.874–0.891) | C statistic χ2 = 53.7 (p < 0.01) | NR | NR | NR |
Xing et al. (2015) [52] | APACHE IV | 0.873 (0.813–0.934) | χ2 = 3.756 (p = 0.878) | NR | NR | NR |
Hamza et al. (2009) [76] | APACHE IV | 0.845 (0.786–0.904) | H statistic χ2 = 5.123 (p = 0.744) | NR | NR | NR |
Evran et al. (2016) [47] | APACHE IV | Presented as a figure | NR | NR | NR | 79.30% |