Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality of included randomized controlled trials using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias

From: Lower versus higher dose of enteral caloric intake in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 

Sequence generation

Concealment

Blinding

Incomplete outcome data

Selective outcome reporting

Other sources of bias

Study center

Percentage of patients lost to follow up

Source of study funding

Montecalvo et al., 1992 [54]

Computer generated

Not described

No

No

No

No

Multiple ICUs, two centers

0

Not reported

Kearns et al., 2000 [55]

Computer generated

Sealed envelope

No

No

No

No

Single

0

Ross Laboratories and the California Institute for Medical Research (partly)

Chen et al., 2006 [56]

Not described

Not described

No

No

No

No

Two ICUs, one center

0

National Science Council

Nguyen et al., 2007 [57]

Computer generated

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

Single

0

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (partly)

Desachy et al., 2008 [58]

Not described

Not described

No

No

No

No

Two ICUs

0

Not reported

Hsu et al., 2009 [59]

Computer generated

Yes

No

No

No

No

Single

0

Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital

White et al., 2009 [60]

Computer generated

Yes (sealed opaque envelope)

No

Yes

No

No

Single

0

Not reported

Montejo et al., 2010 [61]

Not described

Not described

No

No

No

No

Single

0

Not reported

Acosta-Escribano et al., 2010 [62]

Central randomization

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

Multicenter

0

Novartis Consumer Health (Spain)

Arabi et al., 2011 [14]

Computer generated

Yes

No

No

No

No

Single

0

King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology

Singer et al., 2011 [63]

Computer generated

Yes

No

No

No

No

Single

0

Not reported

Rice et al., 2011 [15]

Not described

Yes (sealed opaque envelope)

No

No

No

No

Two ICUs, single center

0

National Institutes of Health (partly)

Rice et al., 2012 [16]

Web-based system

Sealed envelope

No

No

No

No

Multicenter

0

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Huang et al., 2012 [64]

Software-generated randomization

Not described

No

Yes Hospital mortality data were missing for some patients

No

No

Single

Hospital mortality data missing for 4/101 patients (4 %)

Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital

Reignier et al., 2013 [65]

Computer-generated, interactive, web-response system

Yes

No

No

No

No

Multicenter

0

The Centre Hospitalier Departemental de la Vendee

Rugeles et al., 2013 [23]

Computer-generated random allocations

No

Sealed envelopes were used but one investigator knew patient allocation

No

One investigator knew patient allocation.

Yes

Mortality was reported as one of the secondary endpoints but was not reported

Yes

Yes

Many patients were excluded from analysis with uncertainty if exclusion criteria were determined a priori.

Single

0

Lafrancol S.A

Peake et al., 2014 [66]

Web-based system

Centralized, web-based randomization schedule

Yes

No

No

No

Multicenter

One patient in the intervention group was withdrawn and one patient in the control group was lost to follow up by day 90.

The Royal Adelaide Hospital and the Australian, New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and Fresenius Kabi

Charles et al., 2014 [22]

Random number sequence

Opaque security envelopes

No

No

No

Yes

The trial was stopped before achieving the target sample size because of slow enrolment

Single

0

The NIH

Braunschweig et al., 2015 [67]

Computer-generated random allocations

Sealed envelopes

No

No

No

Yes

The trial was stopped before achieving the target sample size because of higher mortality, a secondary outcome, in the intervention group

Single

0

The NIH/NHLBI

Arabi et al., 2015 [68]

Computer-generated random allocations (blocks of variable size

Opaque sealed envelopes

No

No

No

No

Multicenter

9 patients lost to follow up, 3 in the intervention group and 3 in the control group

King Abdullah International Medical Research Center

Doig et al., 2015 [69]

Computer-generated random allocations (blocks of variable size)

Secure central randomization web server

No

No

No

No

Multicenter

4 patients lost to follow up (90-day interview), 2 in each group.

National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia