Skip to main content

The Canadian C-Spine Rule for Radiography in alert and Stable Trauma Patients

Context

The cervical spine (C-spine) of trauma victims has been routinely imaged radiologically to rule out bony injury. Many trauma experts find this exercise unnecessary in the majority of cases who are alert, and without clinical suspicion of injury. This study has three aims: to evaluate the possibility of being more selective and specific in ordering C-spine X-rays in trauma patients who are alert and stable; to examine possible predictor variables against actual patient outcome; and to provide a 'rule' that will be clinically effective in decision-making.

Significant findings

A variety of data were collected from patients with blunt trauma. These variables (e.g. mechanism of injury, neck pain, whether radiography was performed, etc) were then analyzed to find the best combination of predictor variables for detecting clinically important C-spine injury with high sensitivity and specificity. This information was used to derive a rule, which was validated by comparing the classification of patients to their actual status.

Radiology identified clinically significant C-spine injury in 151 (1.7%) patients. The derived rule identified these with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval) and a specificity of 42.5 %(95 % CI). The authors were able to provide recommendations for situations where C-spine radiography is warranted so that resources are used efficiently without jeopardising patient care. Finally, they derived the present 'Canadian C-spine rule'.

Comments

At present there is no well defined algorithm based on research that would allow clinicians to minimise radiological imaging of the C-spine without putting patients at risk. This study attempts to fill that gap in our practice.

There is a potential to miss clinically unimportant (i.e. spinal injury that requires neither stabilization, nor follow up). There were also some patients in the study who did not undergo C-spine radiography if the attending doctors felt that it was not warranted (which is normal practice in Canada).

Methods

A total of 8924 adult patients with significant acute blunt trauma to the head or neck presented to the Emergency Departments of 10 large Canadian community and University hospitals, these were studied as a prospective cohort. Patients were alert and stable as defined by cardiorespiratory parameters.

The primary outcome measure was the incidence of clinically important C-spine injury. Patients underwent plain radiography of the C-spine and some also had flexion-extension views and CT of the C-spine. Patients who did not have any diagnostic radiological imaging were followed up for 14 days.

Additional information

References

  1. 1.

    Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, Clement CM, Lesiuk H, De Maio VJ, Laupacis A, Schull M, McKnight RD, Verbeek R, Brison R, Cass D, Dreyer J, Eisenhauer MA, Greenberg GH, MacPhail I, Morrison L, Reardon M, Worthington J: The Canadian C-Spine Rule for Radiography in alert and Stable Trauma Patients. JAMA. 2001, 286: 1841-1848.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guha, A. The Canadian C-Spine Rule for Radiography in alert and Stable Trauma Patients . Crit Care 6, 73702 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1186/ccf-2001-73702

Download citation

Keywords

  • injury
  • cervical spine; radiological imaging; alert
  • stable trauma patients