Skip to main content

Meta-analysis of detection of respiratory events during procedural sedation

Introduction

The use of procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) has increased in frequency and scope, including emergent settings inside and outside the hospital. Although end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) monitoring is routinely used during general anesthesia to monitor ventilatory status, this is not the case for PSA. Pulse oximetry and visual inspection, both with inherent limitations, represent the current standards of care for monitoring ventilatory status during PSA. EtCO2 monitoring may be a preferable method for detecting alveolar hypoventilation and preventing hypoxemia during PSA but is not widely used in this setting. Our study objective was to determine whether capnography in addition to standard monitoring improved detection of respiratory events compared with standard monitoring alone.

Methods

A literature search was conducted using the electronic databases PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library (Cochrane Reviews, CENTRAL) for studies published between 1995 and 2009 reporting adverse respiratory events during procedural sedation and analgesia with clearly defined EtCO2 threshold, clear study design, P- value calculation, similar outcome and predictor variable definitions, and binary independent and dependent variable raw data. To limit threats from variations in practice, only reports of adults in the USA were included. Five such studies were evaluated independently. A meta-analysis of these studies was performed.

Results

During PSA, cases of respiratory depression were 17.6 times more likely to be detected if monitored by capnography, versus cases not monitored by capnography (95% CI, 2.5 to 122.1; P < 0.004).

Conclusions

This analysis suggests that EtCO2 monitoring is an important addition for detecting respiratory depression during PSA.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JB Waugh.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waugh, J., Khodneva, Y. & Epps, C. Meta-analysis of detection of respiratory events during procedural sedation. Crit Care 15, P350 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9770

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pulse Oximetry
  • Respiratory Depression
  • Cochrane Review
  • Inherent Limitation
  • Cochrane Library