Skip to main content

Optimising the consent process in severe traumatic brain injury trials

Introduction

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a condition often associated with grave consequences and it remains a major public health problem globally. Clinical trials to improve management and treatment of this condition are a necessity; however, there are many issues that impact on the design and conduct of such trials including the complex and sensitive issue of consent. Obtaining consent for severe TBI trials is inherently complicated and difficult because the family are being asked to make an informed decision when they are shocked, anxious, grieving and frequently physically exhausted. We established a process during the DECRA trial to minimise the difficulties and to ensure that consent was obtained with sensitivity and in an informed manner.

Methods

The DECRA trial is a prospective randomised trial of 155 patients from Australia, New Zealand, and Saudi Arabia. Patients with severe traumatic brain injury and refractory intracranial hypertension were randomly assigned to receive either a decompressive craniectomy or to continue with standard medical management. Surrogate consent was obtained prior to randomisation and all participating hospitals had obtained approval from their Human Research & Ethics Committee.

Results

Guidelines for obtaining consent were included in the protocol and manual of operations, and were discussed at the investigators' meetings. The guidelines highlighted the importance of early communication with the patient's medical team regarding possible recruitment into the trial, updating the family about the patient's condition prior to the consent discussion, following a basic script to ensure all aspects of the trial were covered in the discussion, allowing time for the discussion including follow-up discussions and listening carefully to the family's questions. DECRA commenced recruitment in 2003 and the last patient was enrolled in April 2010; 168 consent discussions were held with a 92% consent rate.

Conclusions

Consent rates in brain injury studies in the critical care setting can be optimised by following a protocolised consent process.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the DECRA Trial Investigators, the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group, and the Neurosurgical Society of Australia. Funding was received from NHMRC, TAC, VNI, VTF, Intensive Care Foundation and WA Institute for Medical Research.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to LJ Murray.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murray, L., Cooper, D., Rosenfeld, J. et al. Optimising the consent process in severe traumatic brain injury trials. Crit Care 15, P315 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9735

Download citation

Keywords

  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Intracranial Hypertension
  • Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Consent Process
  • Major Public Health Problem