- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist reduces asynchrony and patient effort in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
© Mauri et al. 2011
- Published: 1 March 2011
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- Pressure Support
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
- Ventilation Mode
- Respiratory System Compliance
Assisted ventilation may prevent muscle atrophy and reduce sedation needs in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, pressure support (PS) is difficult to implement in these patients: inspiratory flow peaks and drops rapidly and the ventilator expiratory phase may overlap patient inspiration causing asynchrony and barotrauma. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is an assisted ventilation mode driven by diaphragmatic electrical activity (EAdi) and should adapt better to patients' respiratory pattern. We measured whether NAVA could reduce asynchrony in severe ARDS patients undergoing ECMO.
We enrolled seven consecutive adult patients undergoing ECMO for severe ARDS. Twenty-four hours after their ventilation mode was switched from controlled to assisted, we randomly tested the following strategies for 30 minutes each, leaving positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), FiO2 and ECMO settings unchanged: (1) PS with expiratory trigger at 30% of flow peak value (PS30); (2) PS with expiratory trigger at 1% (PS1); (3) NAVA. The PS level and NAVA gain were chosen to obtain a similar tidal volume (VT). From continuous recordings of airway pressure, flow, volumes and EAdi we calculated the average VT, respiratory rate (RR) and asynchrony index (AI: number of asynchrony events/(ventilator cycles + wasted efforts) × 100) of each step and, at the end, we measured arterial blood gases and p0.1. Data are the median (IQR) and were compared by nonparametric Friedman test and linear regression.
At enrolment, patients were 44 (42 to 56) years old. Respiratory system compliance (Crs) was 12 (9 to 23) ml/cmH2O, PEEP 10 (7 to 12) cmH2O, FiO2 0.5 (0.4 to 0.5) and VT 2.9 (2.8 to 4) ml/kg. Patients were on 3.2 (2.9 to 3.6) l/minute venovenous ECMO since 22 (16 to 29) days. Switching from PS30 to PS1 to NAVA, PaO2/FiO2 did not change (P = 0.817), p0.1 was reduced (3.1 (2.6 to 5.7) vs. 2.1 (1.8 to 3.2) vs. 1.6 (0.9 to 2.3) cmH2O, P = 0.003) together with RR (P = 0.129) and AI (55 (29 to 66) vs. 46 (26 to 56) vs. 16 (8 to 18)%, P = 0.004). The difference between AI during PS30 and NAVA was significantly correlated with Crs (R2 = 0.87, P = 0.02).
Implementation of NAVA in severe ARDS patients undergoing ECMO may decrease patient effort and asynchrony events. The advantage of NAVA over PS is more evident in patients with lower Crs.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.