- Poster presentation
Assessment of the performance of the SAPS 3, SAPS II, and APACHE II prognostic models in a surgical ICU
Critical Care volume 12, Article number: P502 (2008)
The aim of this study was to assess the comparative performance of the SAPS 3 score with that of the APACHE II and SAPS II scores in surgical ICU patients.
In a cohort, observational study in a 51-bed postoperative ICU of a university hospital, we included all consecutive patients admitted to the ICU between August 2004 and December 2005. The SAPS 3 score was retrospectively calculated from prospectively collected data. The probability of ICU mortality was calculated for SAPS II, APACHE II, adjusted APACHE II (adjAPACHE II), SAPS 3, and customized SAPS 3 for West Europe (C-SAPS3 (Eu)) using standard formulas. A first-level customization was performed using logistic regression on the original scores, and the corresponding probability of ICU death was calculated for the customized scores (C-SAPS II, C-SAPS 3, and C-APACHE II).
The study group constituted 1,851 patients; 1,173 males (63.4%) and 678 females (36.6%), mean age 62 years. Patients were mostly admitted after cardiac surgery (26.4%). Gastrointestinal, neurosurgery, vascular, and trauma surgeries contributed to 18.7%, 8.1%, 5.7%, and 7.5%. The overall ICU and hospital mortality rates were 6.4% and 9%. Hosmer and Lemeshow (H–L) statistics showed poor calibration for SAPS II, APACHE II, adjAPACHE II, SAPS 3, and C-SAPS 3 (Eu) (H–L C-statistics and H-statistics: P > 0.05), whereas C-SAPS II, C-APACHE II, and C-SAPS 3 showed good calibration. Discrimination was generally good for all models (area under the receiver operator curve (aROC) ranged from 0.78 (C-APACHE II score) to 0.89 (C-SAPS 3). APACHE II and C-APACHE II scores had significantly lower aROC compared with other scores. C-SAPS 3 score appears to have the best calibration curve by visual inspection.
In this group of surgical ICU patients the performance of the SAPS 3 score was similar to that of the APACHE II and SAPS II scores. Customization improved calibration of all prognostic models.
About this article
Cite this article
Krauss, C., Sakr, Y., Amaral, A. et al. Assessment of the performance of the SAPS 3, SAPS II, and APACHE II prognostic models in a surgical ICU. Crit Care 12, P502 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6723
- Visual Inspection
- Comparative Performance
- Hospital Mortality
- Operator Curve
- Prognostic Model