Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the observation sessions and opportunities for hand hygiene across study phases

From: Liquid versus gel handrub formulation: a prospective intervention study

 

Phase I

Phase II

P value

Number of observation studies

181

198

 

Number of opportunities

604

553

 

Median duration in minutes

12.3

13.0

0.74

   25%–75% percentiles

8.0–17.0

8.5–16.7

 

HCWa

  

0.17

   Nurses

132 (73)

134 (68)

 

   Physicians

29 (16)

29 (14)

 

   Nursing assistants

12 (6.6)

27 (14)

 

   Other

8 (4.4)

8 (4)

 

Time of daya

  

0.027

   Morning

92 (51)

123 (62)

 

   Afternoon

89 (49)

75 (38)

 

Isolated patienta

64 (35)

57 (29)

0.14

Availability of handruba

   

   In the room

177 (98)

197 (99.5)

0.20

   In the HCW's pocket

16 (9)

17 (9)

0.53

Median number of opportunities per hour

13.7

11.6

0.004

   25%–75% percentiles

8.3–20.6

8.6–16

 

Type of opportunity

  

< 0.001

   Respiratory care

40 (6.6)

47 (8.5)

 

   Intravenous or arterial care

62 (10.3)

60 (10.8)

 

   Direct patient contact

477 (79.0)

374 (68.0)

 

   Digestive care

6 (1.0)

12 (2.0)

 

   Wound care

9 (1.5)

35 (6.0)

 

   Clean device/material

9 (1.5)

18 (3.2)

 

   Urinary care

1 (0.2)

7 (1.5)

 
  1. aData are presented as numbers (percentages). Phase I: use of liquid handrub; phase II: use of gel handrub. HCW, health care worker.