Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Measurement of CO by flow probe, USCOM and PAC in conscious sheep at rest and after dobutamine

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 2
Critical Care200610 (Suppl 1) :P330

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc4677

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Dobutamine
  • Thoracic Aorta
  • Flow Probe
  • Haemodynamic Change
  • Dobutamine Infusion
The PAC remains in clinical use as a measure of CO and haemodynamic trends, despite reports of inefficacy and patient risk. The flow probe (FP) accurately measures flow but is restricted to animal use by the necessity for surgical implantation. USCOM is a novel non-invasive 2D independent CW Doppler device for measurement of CO and haemodynamic change. We compared the USCOM and PAC Baxter intermittent thermodilution (PAC) with FP measurement of baseline CO and dobutamine-induced changes in conscious sheep. FPs were implanted on the ascending thoracic aorta of five sheep, and after 2 weeks recovery a PAC was inserted. In conscious sheep, transcutaneous transpulmonary USCOM signals were acquired and calibrated at baseline to the FP as USCOM calculates flow volumes from a human anthropometric algorithm. Simultaneous FP, USCOM and PAC signals were acquired at baseline and after dobutamine (5, 10, 20 mg/hour), and stored to Spike 2 software while the Doppler data were recorded on the USCOM device. Mean values for baseline measures by FP (n = 862), by USCOM (n = 829) and by PAC (n = 741) were 4.26 ± 0.67 l/min, 4.51 ± 0.90 l/min and 5.34 ± 1.26 l/min, respectively, increasing to 5.33 ± 1.55 l/min, 5.25 ± 1.45 l/min and 6.09 ± 1.61 l/min after dobutamine infusion.

Table 1

 

Sheep 1

Sheep 2

Sheep 3

Sheep 4

Sheep 5

Total

USCOM

0.925

0.764

0.850

0.528

0.659

0.745

PAC

0.114

0.722

0.818

0.517

0.207

0.323

Table 2

 

CO diff – total (%)

CO diff – base (%)

CO diff – dobutamine (%)

FP vs USCOM

-2

-5.5

1

USCOM vs PAC

-19

-15

-19

FP vs PAC

-19

-20

-18

The mean error between paired FP and USCOM measures at baseline was 5.5%, and between FP and PAC was 20.4%, and after dobutamine was 0.6% and 17.9%. For all measures FP and USCOM showed good correlation (r = 0.745), while FP and PAC were poorly correlated (r = 0.323).

USCOM may be a non-invasive alternative to PAC for measurement and monitoring of haemodynamics in animals and humans.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
(2)
The University of Melbourne, Australia
(3)
USCOM Ltd, Sydney, Australia
(4)
The University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ, USA

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2006

Advertisement