- Poster presentation
- Open Access
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and the diagnosis of left ventricular systolic dysfunction: what is the optimal cut-off?
Critical Care volume 9, Article number: P331 (2005)
The neurohormone N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is predominantly released from the left ventricle in response to increasing wall tension, and is suggested as a useful screening test for suspected left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).
To evaluate the predictive value of different NT-proBNP reference cut-off values in patients with clinical symptoms and signs suggestive of LVSD.
NT-proBNP was measured in 1054 patients with clinical symptoms and signs suggestive of LVSD over a 1-year period (September 2003–October 2004). We retrospectively reviewed our digital archive echocardiographic database.
An echocardiogram was performed in 549/1054 (52%) patients. NT-proBNP was >150 ng/l in 744/1054 patients (71%), 42% male, median age 76 years (33–100 years) and > 500 ng/l in 411/1054 patients (40%), 50% male, median age 76 years (33–100 years). ROC curves are shown for NT-proBNP cut-off values of 150 ng/l, positive predictive value (PPV) 0.22 (confidence interval [CI] 0.19–0.25), negative predictive value (NPV) 0.97 (CI 0.94–0.98), and 500 ng/l, PPV 0.3 (CI 0.26–0.35), NPV 0.93 (CI 0.9–0.94), for the detection of LVSD.
At a cut-off value of 500 ng/l, NT-proBNP has a sensitivity 0.85 (CI 0.76–0.91), specificity 0.67 (CI 0.64–0.69), PPV 0.18 (CI 0.15–0.22), and NPV 0.98 (CI 0.97–0.99) at detecting moderate to severe LV impairment.
NT-proBNP is a useful tool in the 'rule-out' of LVSD. An NT-proBNP level of 500 ng/l has a similar negative predictive value to an NT-proBNP level of 150 ng/l with improved positive predictive value. This is particularly important in this population where other confounding comorbidities are common.
About this article
Cite this article
Turley, A., Roberts, A., Kunadian, B. et al. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and the diagnosis of left ventricular systolic dysfunction: what is the optimal cut-off?. Crit Care 9, P331 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc3394
- Public Health
- Confidence Interval
- Left Ventricle
- Clinical Symptom