Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Meeting abstract
  • Open Access

Assessment of cardiorespiratory changes in critically ill patients in two methods employed for mechanical ventilation weaning

  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Critical Care20037 (Suppl 3) :P55

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2251

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Sinus Tachycardia
  • Pressure Support Ventilation
  • Mean Blood Pressure
  • Partial Carbon Dioxide Pressure

Objectives

To analyze gas exchange, respiratory mechanics and cardiovascular monitoring parameters during mechanical ventilation weaning, using pressure support ventilation (PSV) and T-piece techniques, and to compare these variables in subgroups of patients with heart disease (HD) or nonheart disease (NHD).

Materials and methods

A randomized crossover clinical trial comparing PSV and T-piece techniques was performed. Twenty patients, aged 57 ± 15 years, 13 (65%) male and seven (35%) female, who were on mechanical ventilation for a period ranging from 2 to 54 days were studied. The following were analyzed: peripheral oxygen saturation (SaO2), partial carbon dioxide pressure in the exhaled air (PetCO2), respiratory rate, tidal volume (VT), minute ventilation (VE), heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP), changes in ST segment and presence of arrhythmia at the electrocardiographic evaluation. Data were recorded at times 0, 15 and 30 min after the start of the randomized weaning technique, with a 30 min resting interval before starting the second technique. Patients were also grouped as having HD (n = 11) and NHD (n = 9), and compared relative to cardiovascular parameters.

Results

The comparison between PSV and T-piece techniques demonstrated that total SaO2 and PetCO2 were significantly higher during PSV, at all times (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05). As for respiratory rate, it was reduced when subjected to PSV at times 0 and 15 min (P < 0.05). VE and VT were significantly increased while at PSV, at all three times (P < 0.001). There were no differences between the PSV and T-piece techniques for the values of MBP, SBP, DBP and HR. The comparison between PSV and T-piece techniques in patients with HD and NHD has shown that total HR values in patients with HD were significantly lower at time 30 min in PSV (P < 0.05), with no significant difference in the other measurements. The HR was greater in NHD patients, both during PSV and T-piece (P < 0.05). When comparing patients with HD (n = 11) versus NHD patients (n = 9), ST segment changes were observed more often in those with HD (64%) than in NHD patients (11%) (P < 0.05). Arrhythmia occurred in 27% of the patients with HD and in 11% of those with NHD; sinus tachycardia was observed only in NHD patients, in five (56%) of them (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

When comparing PSV and T-piece techniques, the measurements of respiratory parameters and oxygenation displayed better results with the use of PSV. There were no significant differences in the measurements of cardiovascular and EKG parameters. When patients with HD and NHD were compared, a reduction in HR at 30 min on PSV was observed only in those with HD. Also, a greater number of ST segment changes, a smaller occurrence of sinus tachycardia and a trend toward a greater occurrence of arrhythmia in patients with heart disease were observed in both weaning modes.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Serviço de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil

Copyright

Advertisement