- Meeting abstract
- Published:
An audit of re-admission to intensive care after initial recovery from pulmonary resection: is it worthwhile?
Critical Care volume 6, Article number: 3 (2002)
Objective
To audit the outcome of patients admitted to a general intensive care unit (ICU) from a thoracic high dependency unit (HDU) after pulmonary resection.
Methods
A retrospective case note review of 28 consecutive patients (22 male, six female; median age, 66 years [range, 48–80 years]) admitted to the ICU following initial recovery on an HDU after pulmonary resection, in a 3-year period, in a single surgeon thoracic surgical practice.
Results
ICU and 6-month mortalities were 47% (13 patients) and 64% (18 patients), respectively. Need for mechanical ventilation (P = 0.006) and subsequent renal support (P = 0.05) were predictors of hospital mortality on multivariate analysis. All four patients who required both ventilation and renal support died. Only two of 17 patients (12%) who required mechanical ventilation were alive at 6 months (P = 0.002). Age, sex, preoperative pulmonary function, extent of resection, diagnosis, need for reoperation and inotropic requirements were not predictors of poor outcome. Patients who died in the ICU (n = 13) stayed for longer (mean, 17.6 days versus 5.3 days; P = 0.04) and at a higher average cost per patient (£21,992 versus £5300; P = 0.04) than those who survived (n = 15).
Conclusions
Mechanical ventilation for subsequent respiratory complications after initial recovery from lung resection is generally not worthwhile.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pilling, J., Martin-Ucar, A. & Waller, D. An audit of re-admission to intensive care after initial recovery from pulmonary resection: is it worthwhile?. Crit Care 6 (Suppl 2), 3 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc1807
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc1807