Skip to main content

Table 1 Effect on long-term mortality rate of patients with sepsis if the starting point of follow-up is changed

From: Long-term mortality after critical care: what is the starting point?

Study

Longer follow-up reported

Shorter follow-up reported

Long-term mortality changing the starting point

Difference

Reduction

CATS [2] (n = 330)

51.2% (169/330) 90 days

45.5% (150/330) ICU

10.6% (19/180)

40.6%

79.3%

Nesseler et al. [5] (n = 93)

45.2% (42/93) 180 days

28% (26/93) ICU

23.9% (16/67)

21.3%

47.1%

Granja et al. [6] (n = 305)

39.7% (121/305) 180 days

24.6% (75/305) ICU

20.0% (46/230)

19.7%

49.6%

Baudouin et al. [7] (n = 150)

48.7% (73/150) 180 days

27.3% (41/150) ICU

29.4% (32/109)

19.3%

39.6%

Cuthbertson et al. [1] (n = 439)

60.8% (267/439) 5 years

39.2% (172/439) ICU

35.6% (95/267)

25.2%

41.4%

Angus et al. [8] (n = 1,690)

51.0%2.5 years

27.8% (469/1,690) 28 days

32.2%

18.8%

36.9%

VASST [3] (n = 778)

46.7% (360/771) 90 days

37.3% (290/778) 28 days

14.3% (70/488)

32.4%

69.4%

PROWESS-Shock [9] (n = 1,697)

33.4% (556/1,664) 90 days

25.3% (425/1,680) 28 days

10.4% (131/1,255)

23.0%

68.9%

  1. CATS, Catecholamine study; PROWESS, Protein C worldwide evaluation in severe sepsis; VASST, Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock.