Skip to main content

Prospective observational study of handover in a medical ICU

Introduction

Handovers are often associated with poor communication. ICU patients with multiple complex problems are ideal to study naturally occurring handovers. However, few studies have been conducted in the ICU.

Methods

We conducted questionnaires of physicians and nurses involved and observed handovers in real time of medical ICU patients over 1 month.

Results

We interviewed 580 of 672 physicians and nurses involved (86.3%) and observed 90 real-time handovers (45 patients, 26.8%) of 168 patients. Mean duration of handover was 391.3 (± 263.6) seconds, 78.5% were face to face and 1.26 (± 1.75) distractions per handover were noted, person-to-person calling being the commonest mode of distraction (46.7%). Nurses received training during induction in significantly higher numbers, covered allied specialties more and reviewed the patients early (all P 0.05). Perception of the relative importance of different components of the handover varied significantly between donors, recipients, physicians and nurses. Both physicians and nurses seldom (39.7%) reviewed the available electronic past medical records of the patient before handover, which in addition to training in handover and overall confidence level in the management following handover are significantly associated with better satisfaction in univariate analysis; only the confidence level in patient management remained significant after multivariate analysis. However, agreement between donor and recipient on overall satisfaction was poor (P > 0.05). Nursing handovers were significantly longer than physicians' (572.08 ± 214.68 vs. 168.6 ± 97.27 seconds, P 0.001) but are also associated with higher distractions particularly during evening shifts.

Conclusion

A higher percentage of nurses received handover training; nursing handovers are longer and more inclusive of other components of patient management; perceived importance of components of handover varies among healthcare professionals; distractions are common during handovers and associated with longer duration, by nurses and in the evening shifts; and higher confidence level in patient's management following the handover is associated with better satisfaction.

References

  1. 1.

    Ye K, et al.: Handover in the emergency department: deficiencies and adverse effects. Emerg Med Australas 2007, 19: 433-441. 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00984.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Apker J, et al.: Communicating in the 'gray zone': perceptions about emergency physician hospitalist handoffs and patient safety. Acad Emerg Med 2007, 14: 884-894.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Mukhopadhyay.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mukhopadhyay, A., Leong, B., Lua, A. et al. Prospective observational study of handover in a medical ICU. Crit Care 17, P524 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12462

Download citation

Keywords

  • Confidence Level
  • Healthcare Professional
  • Patient Management
  • High Confidence
  • Prospective Observational Study