Skip to main content

Use of physical restraint in Dutch ICUs: prevalence and motives


Physical restraints are used to facilitate essential care and prevent secondary injuries. However, physical restraint may be regarded as humiliating. It may lead to local injury and increase the risk of delirium and post-traumatic stress syndrome. Research on physical restraint is scarce. The aim of this study is to investigate the scope of physical restraint use.


Twenty-one ICUs ranging from local hospitals to academic centres were each visited twice and 327 patients were included. We recorded characteristics of restrained patients, motives and awareness of nurses and physicians.


Physical restraint was applied in 74 (23%) patients, ranging from 0 to 54% in different hospitals. Frequent motives for restraint use were 'possible threat to airway' (36%) and 'pulling lines/probes' (31%). Restrained subjects more often had a positive CAM-ICU (34% vs. 16%, P < 0.001), could less frequently verbally communicate (14% vs. 49%, P < 0.001), and received more often antipsychotics (49% vs. 28%, P < 0.001), or benzodiazepines (55% vs. 36%, P = 0.003). The use of physical restraint was registered in the patient's files in 48% of cases. Of the 310 interviewed nurses, 258 (83%) were familiar with a physical restraint protocol and 89 (29%) used it in any situation. Thirty percent of the 60 interviewed physicians were aware of the physical restraint status of their patients.


Physical restraint is frequently used in Dutch ICUs, but the frequency differs strongly between different ICUs. Attending physicians are often not aware of physical restraint use.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to RJ Raijmakers.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raijmakers, R., Vroegop, R., Tekatli, H. et al. Use of physical restraint in Dutch ICUs: prevalence and motives. Crit Care 17, P393 (2013).

Download citation


  • Public Health
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Local Hospital
  • Academic Centre
  • Secondary Injury