Skip to main content

Comparing the hemodynamic effects of six different colloids

Introduction

Despite the fact that colloids are widely used, doubt still remains as to which colloid is the best and what is the ideal volume of administration. The aim of our study was to compare the hemodynamic effects of six different colloids.

Methods

A total of 180 patients were enrolled in our study undergoing general surgery procedures, who were assigned to six groups (A, B, C, D, E, F). After fasting fluid replacement and induction of anesthesia, 500 ml Gelofusine, Haemaccel, Voluven, HES 6%, HES 10% and Hemohes were administered to each group respectively. An oesophageal Doppler monitor probe was inserted into the patients for measuring stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO). Standard monitoring included ECG, IBP, ETCO2 and SpO2, and heart rate (HR). Systemic arterial pressure (SAP), SV and CO were recorded directly before the administration of any colloid (T0) and every 5 minutes for the next 1 hour (T1 to T12). Kolmogorov-Smirnov was used to test normal distribution of data and ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic data and ASA classification did not differ statistically significant among the six groups of the study. CO, SV, HR and SAP did not show any statistically significant evolution compared with their baseline value during the study period. Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences among the six study groups with regard to any of the recorded parameters.

Conclusion

According to our results, volume replacement with the six colloids tested in our study did not result in any hemodynamic response. Within comparison of these six colloids did not reveal any statistically significant difference in any of the parameters recorded according to our protocol.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N Kteniadakis.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kteniadakis, N., Grosomanidis, V., Oloktsidou, E. et al. Comparing the hemodynamic effects of six different colloids. Crit Care 17, P377 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12315

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cardiac Output
  • Stroke Volume
  • Hemodynamic Effect
  • Hemodynamic Response
  • Fluid Replacement