Skip to main content

Is norepinephrine more effective than other vasopressors for septic shock? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Norepinephrine has been widely used in septic shock. However, its effect remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effect between norepinephrine and other vasopressors.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from database inception until October 2012 were searched. We selected randomized controlled trials in adults with septic shock and compared norepinephrine with other vasopressors. The quality of each study included was assessed with Jadad score. After assessing for heterogeneity of treatment effect across trials using the I2 statistic, we used a fixed effect model (P ≥0.1) or random-effects model (P < 0.1) and expressed results as the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes or the standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous data with 95% CI.

Results

Eighteen trials (n = 2,715) met inclusion criteria, which compared norepinephrine with five different vasopressors (dopamine, vasopressin, epinephrine, terlipressin and phenylephrine). The mean Jadad score was 3.11. Overall, there was no difference in mortality in the comparisons between norepinephrine and vasopressin, epinephrine, terlipressin and phenylephrine (P > 0.05, respectively). However, norepinephrine had a trend in decreasing mortality compared with dopamine (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.02; P = 0.08). There were a decreased heart rate (HR) (SMD, -2.10; 95% CI, -3.95 to -0.25; P = 0.03), cardiac index (SMD, -0.73; 95% CI, -1.14 to -0.03; P = 0.004) and an increased systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) (SMD, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.45; P < 0.0001) with the treatment of norepinephrine compared with dopamine.

Conclusion

There is not sufficient evidence to prove that norepinephrine is superior to vasopressin, epinephrine, terlipressin and phenylephrine in terms of mortality. However, norepinephrine is associated with a decreased HR, cardiac index and an increased SVRI, and appears to have a greater effect on decreasing mortality compared with dopamine.

References

  1. 1.

    Jadad AR, et al.: Control Clin Trials. 1996, 17: 1-12. 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Higgins JP, et al.: BMJ. 2003, 327: 557-560. 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F Zhou.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, F., Peng, Z., Zhang, W. et al. Is norepinephrine more effective than other vasopressors for septic shock? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 17, P221 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12159

Download citation

Keywords

  • Dopamine
  • Norepinephrine
  • Epinephrine
  • Septic Shock
  • Vasopressin