Skip to main content

Perioperative volume management for esophageal cancer surgery


Pulmonary complications are the primary reason for extending a patient's stay in the ICU. The aim of this study was to investigate whether perioperative volume management can influence the PaO2/FiO2 value and total length of stay in the ICU.


Sixteen patients were divided into two groups: one group was treated with a restrictive approach (≤8 ml/kg/hour), and the other with a liberal approach (> 8 ml/kg/hour). Patients were randomly allocated using sealed envelopes. During the thoracic part of the surgical procedure, all patients received one-lung ventilation (OLV).


In the group treated with a restrictive volume approach, patients received fluids at the rate of 7.0 ± 1.0 ml/kg/hour. PaO2/FiO2 was 288 ± 14 after intubation and 270 ± 22 before extubation. In the group treated with a liberal volume approach, fluids were replaced at 11.0 ± 2.0 ml/kg/hour. PaO2/FiO2 was 259 ± 24 after intubation and 223 ± 43 before extubation. Surgery combined with OLV was found to significantly affect the PaO2/FiO2 value (ANOVA, F 1,14 = 15.85a, P = 0.001, partial η2 = 0.531). The average PaO2/FiO2 level was significantly higher in the restrictive-replacement group than in the liberal-replacement group (ANOVA, F 1,14 = 9.66, P = 0.008, partial η2 = 0.408). There was no interaction between the groups (ANOVA, F 1,14 = 1.7a, P = 0.215, partial η2 = 0.108). Mean length of stay in the ICU was similar between the restrictive-replacement group (5.2 ± 2.3 days) and the liberalreplacement group (6.3 ± 1.6 days) (ANOVA, F 1,14 = 0.814a, P = 0.382, partial η2 = 0.055).


Results from this small sample indicate that esophageal carcinoma surgery by itself had a detrimental effect on the PaO2/FiO2 value, which restriction of perioperative volume did not significantly affect. Volume restriction also did not affect length of stay in the ICU.


  1. 1.

    Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I: Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 2005, 103: 25-32. 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wei S, Tian J, Song X, Chen Y: Association of perioperative fluid balance and adverse surgical outcomes in esophageal cancer and esophagogastric junction cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2008, 86: 266-272. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.03.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Karaman Ilic.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ilic, M.K., Madžarac, G., Kogler, J. et al. Perioperative volume management for esophageal cancer surgery. Crit Care 17, P194 (2013).

Download citation


  • Esophageal Cancer
  • Esophageal Carcinoma
  • Pulmonary Complication
  • Volume Restriction
  • Seal Envelope