Skip to main content

Is automated brachial cuff measurement of arterial pressure less accurate in cases of arrhythmia?

Introduction

In cases of arrhythmia, the beat-to-beat variation of arterial pressure (AP) may impair the accuracy of automated cuff measurements. Indeed, this oscillometric device relies on the detection of arterial wall oscillations. Our aim was to determine, in ICU patients, whether brachial cuff measurements are really less reliable during arrhythmia than during regular rhythm.

Methods

Patients with arrhythmia and carrying an intra-arterial catheter were prospectively and consecutively included in this multicenter study. After each arrhythmic inclusion, a regular rhythm patient was included. A second inclusion was possible in case of change in the cardiac rhythm. Three pairs of invasive and brachial cuff (Philips® MP70 monitor) measurements of mean arterial pressure (MAP) were respectively averaged. Some patients underwent a second set of measurements, after a cardiovascular intervention (passive leg raising, volume expansion, initiation of/increase in catecholamine infusion) allowing the assessment of MAP changes.

Results

In the 111 analyzed inclusions (in 103 patients) there was only one failure in displaying a brachial cuff measurement of MAP. Arrhythmic patients (atrial fibrillation 88%, frequent extrasystoles 7%, flutter 5%) were similar (P > 0.3) to patients in regular rhythm for MAP (median 74 (IQR 67 to 80) vs. 75 (69 to 84) mmHg), SAPS II score, BMI, arm circumference, norepinephrine administration (36% vs. 35%), mechanical ventilation (80% vs. 81%), and site of the intraarterial catheter (radial artery: 80% vs. 85%). Between arrhythmic and regular rhythm patients: the agreement (Bland-Altman analysis) between invasive and brachial cuff measurements of MAP was similar (mean bias -0.4 ± 7.2 (limits of agreement -14/14) mmHg vs. 3.0 ± 8.2 (-13/19) mmHg, respectively); the detection of hypotension (invasive MAP <65 mmHg) by the brachial cuff was of similar reliability (area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.91 (95% CI = 0.80 to 0.97) vs. AUC = 0.98 (0.89 to 1), P = 0.2); and the detection of a response (>10% increase in MAP) to therapy was of similar reliability (AUC = 1 (0.85 to 1) (n = 22) vs. AUC = 0.99 (0.78 to 1) (n = 17), P = 0.5).

Conclusion

These preliminary results suggest that arrhythmia does not impair the reliability of automated cuff measurements of MAP.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K Lakhal.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lakhal, K., Faiz, S., Martin, M. et al. Is automated brachial cuff measurement of arterial pressure less accurate in cases of arrhythmia?. Crit Care 17, P176 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12114

Download citation

Keywords

  • Arterial Pressure
  • Mean Arterial Pressure
  • Radial Artery
  • Cardiovascular Intervention
  • Oscillometric Device